Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/85805
Title: Colorectal cancer outcomes by age among ARCAD first- and second-line clinical trials
Author(s): McCleary, Nadine J.
Harmsen, William S.
Haakenstad, Ellana
Cleary, James M.
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
Zalcberg, John
Adams, Richard
Grothey, Axel
Sobrero, Alberto F.
Van Cutsem, Eric
Goldberg, Richard M.
Peeters, Marc
Tabernero, Josep
Seymour, Matt
Saltz, Leonard B.
Giantonio, Bruce J.
Arnold, Dirk
Rothenberg, Mace L.
Koopman, Miriam
Schmoll, Hans-Joachim
Pitot, Henry C.
Hoff, Paulo M.
Tebbutt, Niall
Masi, Gianluca
Souglakos, John
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Heinemann, Volker
Yoshino, Takayuki
Chibaudel, Benoist
deGramont, Aimery
Shi, Qian
Lichtman, Stuart M.
Issue Date: 2022
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: We evaluated the time to progression (TTP) and survival outcomes of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer among adults aged 70 years and older compared with younger adults following progression on first-line clinical trials. Methods: Associations between clinical and disease characteristics, time to initial progression, and rate of receipt of second-line therapy were evaluated. TTP and overall survival (OS) were compared between older and younger adults in first- and second-line trials by Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, number of metastatic sites and presence of metastasis in the lung, liver, or peritoneum. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: Older adults comprised 16.4% of patients on first-line trials (870 total older adults aged >70 years; 4419 total younger adults aged ≤70 years, on first-line trials). Older adults and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >0 were less likely to receive second-line therapy than younger adults. Odds of receiving second-line therapy decreased by 11% for each additional decade of life in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 1.21, P = .01). Older and younger adults enrolled in second-line trials experienced similar median TTP and median OS (median TTP = 5.1 vs 5.2 months, respectively; median OS = 11.6 vs 12.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: Older adults were less likely to receive second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, though we did not observe a statistical difference in survival outcomes vs younger adults following second-line therapy. Further study should examine factors affecting decisions to treat older adults with second-line therapy. Inclusion of geriatric assessment may provide better criteria regarding the risks and benefits of second-line therapy.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/87757
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/85805
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0(CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0
Sponsor/Funder: Publikationsfonds MLU
Journal Title: JNCI cancer spectrum
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publisher Place: Oxford
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
Original Publication: 10.1093/jncics/pkac014
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pkac014.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open