<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/13536" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/13536</id>
  <updated>2026-04-16T12:28:35Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-16T12:28:35Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Taking it outside : a study of legal contexts and external whistleblowing in China and India</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/99790" />
    <author>
      <name>Oelrich, Sebastian</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Erlebach, Kimberly</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/99790</id>
    <updated>2023-01-21T02:18:14Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Taking it outside : a study of legal contexts and external whistleblowing in China and India
Author(s): Oelrich, Sebastian; Erlebach, Kimberly
Abstract: Whistleblowing is regularly identified as corporate control mechanism to prevent and&#xD;
uncover fraud. We review and compare the legal situation for whistleblowers in the&#xD;
People’s Republic of China and India. In a survey of 942 employees from private&#xD;
companies in both countries, we take a look at the status quo of whistleblowing system&#xD;
implementation, explore preference of channels to disclose fraud or corruption, and&#xD;
analyze under which conditions and what kind of employees prefer external over&#xD;
internal whistleblowing. We find that provisions for mandatory whistleblowing systems&#xD;
can be found in the law of both countries. In China in particular, protection is&#xD;
scattered across many different laws in the private sector. Indian companies seem to&#xD;
have systems in place more often, although this difference becomes smaller the larger&#xD;
the company. The general preference of internal over external channels is similar across&#xD;
countries. Our regression models suggest that external channels are preferred over&#xD;
internal ones when fear of retaliatory measures is higher, the company is smaller, and&#xD;
the whistleblower is female. In line with prior literature, the effect of fear of retaliation&#xD;
is moderated by gender: women are less influenced by retaliation. All in all, implementation&#xD;
of whistleblowing systems seems ubiquitous in both countries; legal protection&#xD;
and comprehensive measures to decrease retaliation are lacking. Additional implications&#xD;
of findings are discussed.</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Carry trade returns and segmented risk pricing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/99284" />
    <author>
      <name>Schulze, Gordon</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/99284</id>
    <updated>2023-01-17T01:43:40Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Carry trade returns and segmented risk pricing
Author(s): Schulze, Gordon
Abstract: The returns to carry trades are controversially discussed. There seems to&#xD;
be no unifying risk-based explanation of currency returns and stock returns, while&#xD;
the countries’ interest rate differential plays a leading part in the carry-trade performance.&#xD;
Therefore, this paper addresses carry-trade returns from a risk-pricing perspective&#xD;
and examines if these returns can be connected to cross-country differences&#xD;
in risk pricing in the interest-rate market compared to the stock market. Data from&#xD;
Thomson Reuters Datastream and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering Australia,&#xD;
Japan, New Zealand, Switzerland and the United States were analyzed based&#xD;
on GMM estimation. The results indicate significant and persistent cross-country&#xD;
differences in risk aversion in the interest-rate market compared to the implied risk&#xD;
aversion in the stock market. This may offer opportunities for risk arbitrage and,&#xD;
therefore, a risk pricing-related explanation of carry-trade returns.</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intention without action? : differences between whistleblowing intention and behavior on corruption and fraud</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/98155" />
    <author>
      <name>Oelrich, Sebastian</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/98155</id>
    <updated>2022-12-06T01:47:42Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Intention without action? : differences between whistleblowing intention and behavior on corruption and fraud
Author(s): Oelrich, Sebastian
Abstract: Whistleblowing is an effective tool against fraud and corruption in organizations.&#xD;
However, as researchers have struggled to acquire data on actual whistleblowers,&#xD;
research relies on hypothetical intention data and student samples, which is seen as&#xD;
a major limitation. Using a field study of 1,416 employees from China, Germany, and&#xD;
Russia, the purpose of this article is to identify differences and similarities between&#xD;
intention and actual whistleblowing decisions, thus aiding research and interpretation&#xD;
of prior and future studies. I also contribute by analyzing whether findings can&#xD;
be generalized across different cultures and whether status and power influence the&#xD;
whistleblowing process. My results reveal that the key difference between hypothetical&#xD;
and real decisions is not in variables that affect the process, but in effect sizes:&#xD;
Employees underestimate the effect of situational (retaliation) and organizational&#xD;
(compliance measures) variables in hypothetical compared to actual whistleblowing.&#xD;
Thus, reliance on intention research is not inherently problematic, when effect sizes&#xD;
are interpreted with caution. I also find that results are similar across countries and&#xD;
that status and power may not be decisive factors in whistleblowing. My findings&#xD;
should also be of interest to practitioners and policymakers, as they assist in designing&#xD;
effective whistleblowing systems and environments in organizations.</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mapping the jungle : a bibliometric analysis of research into construal level theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/94679" />
    <author>
      <name>Adler, Susanne</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Sarstedt, Marko</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/94679</id>
    <updated>2022-11-15T01:45:32Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Mapping the jungle : a bibliometric analysis of research into construal level theory
Author(s): Adler, Susanne; Sarstedt, Marko
Abstract: Construal level theory (CLT) offers a valuable framework to explain the mechanisms&#xD;
that trigger evaluations, predictions, and behaviors by linking the&#xD;
degree of mental abstraction (the construal level) to psychological distance.&#xD;
CLT‐related research has produced numerous publications in a variety of domains,&#xD;
impeding an ongoing overview of the research field and limiting its advancement.&#xD;
Addressing this concern, our paper presents the results of a&#xD;
comprehensive bibliometric analysis of CLT‐related research. This analysis&#xD;
identifies leading authors and the networks in which they operate. We find that&#xD;
a well‐connected, stable core of prominent authors predominantly shaped CLT&#xD;
research and was responsible for its expansion. In addition, we used topic&#xD;
modeling to identify latent topics and research trends, with the results showing&#xD;
that CLT research has expanded into more interdisciplinary and applied contexts.&#xD;
Specifically, although CLT's relevance for consumer research has amplified&#xD;
and applications in areas such as climate change and sustainability have&#xD;
surged, the classic areas of CLT research, such as planning fallacy and impulse&#xD;
control, have lost momentum. Building upon the results of our topic analysis,&#xD;
we identify future research paths and specifically call for a more comprehensive&#xD;
societal focus in CLT‐related research.</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

