Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/106358
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T18:47:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-23T18:47:21Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/108313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/106358-
dc.format.extentOnline-Ressource (Text, 80 kB)-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherThe Royal Inst. of Internat. Affairs [u.a.]-
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/-
dc.subject.ddc090-
dc.subject.otherssg:ssg3.2.2.6.3-
dc.titleReport of an expert meeting which assessed procedural criticisms made of the UN fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict (the Goldstone report) / Chatham House Study Group-
dc.typeBook-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:3:5-63530-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn664500420-
local.mets.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de/retrieve/1fdf1dc8-e9a0-473e-b451-8c857db7d7e7/mets.xml-
dc.genrebook-
dc.genrebook-
cbs.publication.displayformLondon : The Royal Inst. of Internat. Affairs [u.a.], 2009-
cbs.picatypeOa-
dc.contributor.contributorChatham House Study Group-
Appears in Collections:Drucke

Ressources:
Thumbnail
View online  
  
Download  
79.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open