Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36295
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorInvernizzi, Azzurra-
dc.contributor.authorHaykal, Shereif-
dc.contributor.authorLo Faro, Valeria-
dc.contributor.authorPennisi, Vincenzo-
dc.contributor.authorChoritz, Lars-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T09:59:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-14T09:59:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/36528-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36295-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Eyemate® is a system for the continual monitoring of intraocular pressure (IOP), composed of an intraocular sensor, and a hand-held reader device. As the eyemate®-IO sensor communicates with the hand-held reader telemetrically, some patients might fear that the electronic devices that they use on a daily basis might somehow interfere with this communication, leading to unreliable measurements of IOP. In this study, we investigated the effect of electromagnetic radiation produced by a number of everyday electronic devices on the measurements made by an eyemate®-IO sensor in-vitro, in an artificial and controlled environment. Methods: The eyemate®-IO sensor was suspended in a sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution and placed in a water bath at 37 °C. The antenna, connected to a laptop for recording the data, was positioned at a fixed distance of 1 cm from the sensor. Approximately 2 hrs of “quasi-continuous” measurements were recorded for the baseline and for a cordless phone, a smart-phone and a laptop. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare any possible differences between the baseline and the tested devices. Results: For baseline measurements, the sensor maintained a steady-state, resulting in a flat profile at a mean pressure reading of 0.795 ± 0.45 hPa, with no apparent drift. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.332) was found between the fluctuations in the baseline and the tested devices (phone: 0.76 ± 0.41 hPa; cordless: 0.787 ± 0.26 hPa; laptop: 0.775 ± 0.39 hPa). Conclusion: In our in-vitro environment, we found no evidence of signal drifts or fluctuations associated with the tested devices, thus showing a lack of electromagnetic interference with data transmission in the tested frequency ranges.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG-Publikationsfonds 2020-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectIntraocular pressureeng
dc.subjectElectromagnetic radiationeng
dc.subjectGlaucomaeng
dc.subjectEyemate® systemeng
dc.subject.ddc610.72-
dc.titleInfluence of electromagnetic radiation emitted by daily-use electronic devices on the Eyemate® system in-vitro : a feasibility studyeng
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-365285-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBMC ophthalmology-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume20-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2020-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend6-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameBioMed Central-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLondon-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1186/s12886-020-01623-6-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1741199409-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2020-
cbs.sru.importDate2021-04-14T09:36:07Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in BMC ophthalmology - London : BioMed Central, 2001-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Medizinische Fakultät (OA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Invernizzi et al._Influence_2020.pdfZweitveröffentlichung1 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open