Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36295
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Invernizzi, Azzurra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Haykal, Shereif | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lo Faro, Valeria | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pennisi, Vincenzo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choritz, Lars | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-14T09:59:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-14T09:59:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/36528 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36295 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Eyemate® is a system for the continual monitoring of intraocular pressure (IOP), composed of an intraocular sensor, and a hand-held reader device. As the eyemate®-IO sensor communicates with the hand-held reader telemetrically, some patients might fear that the electronic devices that they use on a daily basis might somehow interfere with this communication, leading to unreliable measurements of IOP. In this study, we investigated the effect of electromagnetic radiation produced by a number of everyday electronic devices on the measurements made by an eyemate®-IO sensor in-vitro, in an artificial and controlled environment. Methods: The eyemate®-IO sensor was suspended in a sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution and placed in a water bath at 37 °C. The antenna, connected to a laptop for recording the data, was positioned at a fixed distance of 1 cm from the sensor. Approximately 2 hrs of “quasi-continuous” measurements were recorded for the baseline and for a cordless phone, a smart-phone and a laptop. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare any possible differences between the baseline and the tested devices. Results: For baseline measurements, the sensor maintained a steady-state, resulting in a flat profile at a mean pressure reading of 0.795 ± 0.45 hPa, with no apparent drift. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.332) was found between the fluctuations in the baseline and the tested devices (phone: 0.76 ± 0.41 hPa; cordless: 0.787 ± 0.26 hPa; laptop: 0.775 ± 0.39 hPa). Conclusion: In our in-vitro environment, we found no evidence of signal drifts or fluctuations associated with the tested devices, thus showing a lack of electromagnetic interference with data transmission in the tested frequency ranges. | eng |
dc.description.sponsorship | DFG-Publikationsfonds 2020 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | http://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/ | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | Intraocular pressure | eng |
dc.subject | Electromagnetic radiation | eng |
dc.subject | Glaucoma | eng |
dc.subject | Eyemate® system | eng |
dc.subject.ddc | 610.72 | - |
dc.title | Influence of electromagnetic radiation emitted by daily-use electronic devices on the Eyemate® system in-vitro : a feasibility study | eng |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-365285 | - |
local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | BMC ophthalmology | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 20 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 2020 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 1 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 6 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | BioMed Central | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | London | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1186/s12886-020-01623-6 | - |
local.openaccess | true | - |
dc.identifier.ppn | 1741199409 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2020 | - |
cbs.sru.importDate | 2021-04-14T09:36:07Z | - |
local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in BMC ophthalmology - London : BioMed Central, 2001 | - |
local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
Appears in Collections: | Medizinische Fakultät (OA) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Invernizzi et al._Influence_2020.pdf | Zweitveröffentlichung | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |