Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/79502
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bielitzki, Robert | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hamacher, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zech, Astrid | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-28T12:13:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-28T12:13:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/81456 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/79502 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: American football players need the ability to provide maximal muscular power in a modicum of time. Postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE), which is characterized by an acute improvement of a performance measure following conditioning contractions, could be of value for American football players. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a heavy load back squat PAPE protocol on three-point explosion (TPE; an essential blocking technique and drill) and 40-yard dash (40YD) performance compared to a traditional warm-up in American football players. Methods: In a crossover study design, eighteen male competitive regional league American football players (mean ± SD: body mass 93.9 ± 15.5 kg, height 181.4 ± 6.8 cm, age 24.8 ± 3.9 years) performed a TPE on a double blocking sled (weight: 150 kg) and a 40YD (36.6 m with a 5 and 10 m split) 8 min after two different warm-up conditions. One condition was a traditional, football specific warm-up (TWU) consisting of game related movements (e.g. backward lunges, lateral power steps), whereas the other condition (PAPE) consisted of three explosive back squats with a load of 91 % one-repetition maximum. Results: There was no significant difference in TPE between TWU and PAPE. For the 40YD, we found significantly shorter sprint times in the PAPE condition with medium effect sizes for the 5 m (p = 0.007; r = 0.45) and 10 m (p = 0.020; r = 0.39) but not for the whole 36.6 m distance (p = 0.084; r = 0.29) compared to the TWU condition. Conclusions: The used heavy load back squat PAPE protocol improved sprint performance over short distances (≤ 10 m) but not complex movements like the three-point explosion. | eng |
dc.description.sponsorship | OVGU-Publikationsfonds 2021 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2083 | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | Postactivation potentiation | eng |
dc.subject | Conditioning contraction | eng |
dc.subject | Sprint performance | eng |
dc.subject | Squat | eng |
dc.subject | Blocking | eng |
dc.subject.ddc | 790 | - |
dc.title | Does one heavy load back squat set lead to postactivation performance enhancement of three-point explosion and sprint in third division American football players? | eng |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-814562 | - |
local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 13 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 2021 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 1 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 7 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | BioMed Central | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | London | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1186/s13102-021-00288-y | - |
local.openaccess | true | - |
dc.identifier.ppn | 1795781025 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2021 | - |
cbs.sru.importDate | 2022-03-28T12:09:40Z | - |
local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation - London : BioMed Central, 2013 | - |
local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
Appears in Collections: | Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (ehemals: Fakultät für Geistes-, Sozial- und Erziehungswissenschaften) (OA) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bielitzki et al._Does one heavy_2021.pdf | Zweitveröffentlichung | 1.07 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |