Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/92311
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeier, Raffael-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T08:05:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-10T08:05:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/94263-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/92311-
dc.description.abstractEmphasising implicit assumptions behind our ways of seeing ‘slums’, this essay calls for a radical understanding of ‘ordinary neighbourhoods’. Borrowing from Robinson’s ‘ordinary cities’ concept, it conceptualises ‘ordinariness’ as a way of rejecting the ‘absolute otherness’ of slums, stressing heterogeneity within and between neighbourhoods as well as the significance of comparative empirical research. Beyond the need for alternative, less stigmatised terms, the article urges for a new territorial ethics, a radical deconstruction and de-mystification of the ‘slum’. Such conceptualisation should make aware of the term ‘slum’ as a non-physical, spatially detached social construct that discredits marginalised people and diverts attention away from precarious living conditions and possible ways of improving them.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddcDDC::9** Geschichte und Geografie::91* Geografie, Reisen::916 Geografie Afrikas und Reisen in Afrika-
dc.titleOrdinary Neighbourhoodseng
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:3:5-1981185920-942635-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitlePlanning theory-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume0-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend17-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSage-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceThousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]-
local.subject.keywordsEmphasising implicit assumptions behind our ways of seeing ‘slums’, this essay calls for a radical understanding of ‘ordinary neighbourhoods’. Borrowing from Robinson’s ‘ordinary cities’ concept, it conceptualises ‘ordinariness’ as a way of rejecting the ‘absolute otherness’ of slums, stressing heterogeneity within and between neighbourhoods as well as the significance of comparative empirical research. Beyond the need for alternative, less stigmatised terms, the article urges for a new territorial ethics, a radical deconstruction and de-mystification of the ‘slum’. Such conceptualisation should make aware of the term ‘slum’ as a non-physical, spatially detached social construct that discredits marginalised people and diverts attention away from precarious living conditions and possible ways of improving them.$Leng-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1817393510-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2022-
cbs.sru.importDate2022-10-10T08:01:45Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Planning theory - Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 2002-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Zweitveröffentlichungen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Beier_2022_ordinary_neighbourhoods.pdf1.99 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open