Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120972
Title: The Relationship Between Executive and Parliament and the Problem of Constitutional Interpretation and Adjudication During the Karzai Years (Dari)
Author(s): Eroglu, Tarik
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim
Issue Date: 2015
Type: Article
Language: Persian
Publisher: مجله مطالعات حقوقی افغانستان
Abstract: This article advances an enquiry into President Hamid Karzai's (r. 2001-2014) constitutional legacy with special reference to relations between the executive and legislature during his presidency. Before engaging in that enquiry, a brief account is given in the introduction of the developments during the months following Karzai's exit from office. What happened during this period tends to accentuate the unresolved issues of Karzai's presidency and put Afghani- stan's commitment to constitutionalism to the test. The events of the past six months also point to the need for clarity regarding the status of constitutional interpretation and judicial review, two necessary ingredients of constitutional- ism that ensure the conformity of laws and government action with the con- stitution. Dysfunctional executive-legislature relations and ambiguities over matters of interpretation have often meant that disagreement over issues did not find prompt and effective solutions. This article is structured with an introduction and six sections. The introduc- tion takes a look, as already mentioned, at the developments after Karzai left office. The first section discusses the presidential system Afghanistan has ad- opted under the 2004 Constitution, and the succeeding two sections address constitutional interpretation and the question as to who has the power to interpret the Constitution. Sections four and five are devoted to a discussion of judicial review, and the conflict of jurisdiction over who has the power of judicial review in Afghanistan respectively. The last section looks into the par- liamentary powers with special reference to the use of the no-confidence vote by the Wolesi Jirga. This article concludes with a brief reflection back on the post-Karzai developments, the hitherto unmet challenges over constitutional issues Afghanistan is faced with, and the way forward toward solutions.
Annotations: The Journal of Afghan Legal Studies (JALS) is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to Afghan law and related legal topics. It is published by the Institute for Law and Society in Afghanistan (ILSAF) and includes articles in Dari, Pashto, and English. The journal focuses on state law, Islamic law, customary law, international law, and other legal norms relevant to Afghanistan and its people. JALS is distributed both within Afghanistan and internationally.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/122927
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120972
ISSN: 2522-3070
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: مجله مطالعات حقوقی افغانستان
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Original Publication: https://public.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/jals/article/view/3174/version/3121
Page Start: 115
Page End: 154
Appears in Collections:Open Journal System ULB

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jals_volume_1_7184.pdf407.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
jals_volume_1_7183.pdf407.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open