Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36474
Titel: Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases : an experience from a German Academic Center
Autor(en): Rahimli, Mirhasan
Perrakis, AristotelisIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Schellerer, Vera Simone AngelaIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Gumbs, Andrew
Lorenz, Eric
Franz, Mareike
Arend, JörgIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Negrini, Victor-Radu
Croner, RolandIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-367066
Schlagwörter: Robotic surgery
Laparoscopic surgery
Liver resection
Surgical oncology
Colorectal liver metastases
Da Vinci
Zusammenfassung: Background: Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results: Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion: Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/36706
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36474
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Sponsor/Geldgeber: DFG-Publikationsfonds 2020
Journal Titel: World journal of surgical oncology
Verlag: Biomed Central
Verlagsort: London
Band: 18
Heft: 2020
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1
Seitenanfang: 1
Seitenende: 8
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Medizinische Fakultät (OA)

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Rahimli et al._Robotic_2020.pdfZweitveröffentlichung530.46 kBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen