Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/38752
Title: Effect of a multimodal movement intervention in patients with neurogenic claudication based on lumbar spinal stenosis and/or degenerative spondylolisthesis : a pilot study
Author(s): Broscheid, Kim-Charline
Behrendt, Tom
Hamacher, Dennis
Böker, Svantje
Gagelmann, Tabea
Schmidt, Christian
Caspari, Christina
Meiler, Katharina
Napiontek, Andre
Franke, Jörg
Schega, LutzLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2020
Type: Article
Language: English
URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-389987
Subjects: Chronic low-back pain
Movement intervention
Brief Pain Inventory
Abstract: Chronic low-back pain is a major individual, social, and economic burden. The impairment ranges from deterioration of gait, limited mobility, to psychosocial distress. Due to this complexity, the demand for multimodal treatments is huge. Our purpose is to compare the effects of a multimodal movement intervention (MI) (coordinative–cognitive exercises and dancing program) with standard physical therapy (PT) on gait, physical function, and quality of life in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The study design is based on a 6-week intervention with a two (group: MI/PT) by two (measurement time points: pre-/post-test) parallel group design with random assignment. Twenty-four subjects (18 female/6 male, 70.8 ± 10.6 years old) diagnosed with LSS were included and randomly allocated to the MI or PT group. The primary outcomes are minimum toe clearance (MTC) and double step length (DSL) variability and the Timed “Up & Go” test (TUG). Secondary outcomes are the Brief Pain Inventory, the short Fall Efficacy Scale–International (sFES-I), and the Oswestry Disability Index. Nine subjects for each group could be analyzed. The MTC variability revealed a significant between-group difference in the posttest (p = 0.008) showing a lower MTC variability for the MI compared to the PT group. The MI group displayed an improved TUG (p = 0.031) and a reduced sFES-I (p = 0.044). The decreased MTC variability and fear of falling as well as the improved functional mobility may contribute to a reduced risk of falling. For the subsequent study, further kinematic and cognitive parameters should be analyzed, and the number of participants has to be increased.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/38998
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/38752
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Sponsor/Funder: OVGU-Publikationsfonds 2020
Journal Title: Frontiers in medicine
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Publisher Place: Lausanne
Volume: 7
Issue: 2020
Original Publication: 10.3389/fmed.2020.540070
Page Start: 1
Page End: 8
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (ehemals: Fakultät für Geistes-, Sozial- und Erziehungswissenschaften) (OA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Broscheid et al._Effect of a multimodal_2020.pdfZweitveröffentlichung552.7 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open