Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101309
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJoeres, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorMielke, Tonia-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T09:16:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-07T09:16:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/103264-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101309-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Resection site repair during laparoscopic oncological surgery (e.g. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) poses some unique challenges and opportunities for augmented reality (AR) navigation support. This work introduces an AR registration workflow that addresses the time pressure that is present during resection site repair. Methods We propose a two-step registration process: the AR content is registered as accurately as possible prior to the tumour resection (the primary registration). This accurate registration is used to apply artificial fiducials to the physical organ and the virtual model. After the resection, these fiducials can be used for rapid re-registration (the secondary registration). We tested this pipeline in a simulated-use study with N = 18 participants. We compared the registration accuracy and speed for our method and for landmark-based registration as a reference. Results Acquisition of and, thereby, registration with the artificial fiducials were significantly faster than the initial use of anatomical landmarks. Our method also had a trend to be more accurate in cases in which the primary registration was successful. The accuracy loss between the elaborate primary registration and the rapid secondary registration could be quantified with a mean target registration error increase of 2.35mm. Conclusion This work introduces a registration pipeline for AR navigation support during laparoscopic resection site repair and provides a successful proof-of-concept evaluation thereof. Our results indicate that the concept is better suited than landmark-based registration during this phase, but further work is required to demonstrate clinical suitability and applicability.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipProjekt DEAL 2021-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://link.springer.com/journal/11548-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectAugmented realityeng
dc.subjectLaparoscopic surgeryeng
dc.subjectPartial nephrectomyeng
dc.subjectRegistration-
dc.subject.ddc000-
dc.titleLaparoscopic augmented reality registration for oncological resection site repaireng
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-1032646-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume16-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue9-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1577-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend1586-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s11548-021-02336-x-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1761007459-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2021-
cbs.sru.importDate2023-03-07T09:13:15Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery - Berlin : Springer, 2006-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Informatik (OA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Joeres et al._ Laparoscopic augmented_2021.pdfZweitveröffentlichung1.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open