Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101640
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Leplow, Bernd | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pohl, Johannes | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wöllner, Julia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Weise, David | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-31T07:32:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-31T07:32:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/103587 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101640 | - |
dc.description.abstract | On a group level, satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment in neurological indications is high. However, it is well known that a relevant amount of patients may not respond as expected. The aim of this study is to evaluate the BoNT treatment outcome on an individual level using a statistical single-case analysis as an adjunct to traditional group statistics. The course of the daily perceived severity of symptoms across a BoNT cycle was analyzed in 20 cervical dystonia (CD) and 15 hemifacial spasm (HFS) patients. A parametric single-case autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) time series analysis was used to detect individual responsiveness to BoNT treatment. Overall, both CD and HFS patients significantly responded to BoNT treatment with a gradual worsening of symptom intensities towards BoNT reinjection. However, only 8/20 CD patients (40%) and 5/15 HFS patients (33.3%) displayed the expected U-shaped curve of BoNT efficacy across a single treatment cycle. CD (but not HFS) patients who followed the expected outcome course had longer BoNT injection intervals, showed a better match to objective symptom assessments, and were characterized by a stronger certainty to control their somatic symptoms (i.e., internal medical locus of control). In addition to standard evaluation procedures, patients should be identified who do not follow the mean course-of-treatment effect. Thus, the ARIMA single-case time series analysis seems to be an appropriate addition to clinical treatment studies in order to detect individual courses of subjective symptom intensities. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 615 | - |
dc.title | Individual response to botulinum toxin therapy in movement disorders : a time series analysis approach | eng |
dc.type | Article | - |
local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Toxins | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 14 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 8 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | MDPI | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | Basel | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.3390/toxins14080508 | - |
local.subject.keywords | dystonia, hemifacial spasm, botulinum neurotoxin, ARIMA single-case autoregressive integrated moving average, adherence | - |
local.openaccess | true | - |
dc.identifier.ppn | 1812496516 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2022 | - |
cbs.sru.importDate | 2023-03-31T07:32:08Z | - |
local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in Toxins - Basel : MDPI, 2009 | - |
local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
toxins-14-00508-v2.pdf | 722.96 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |