Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLühnen, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorFrese, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMau, Wilfried-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Gabriele-
dc.contributor.authorMikolajczyk, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorSchildmann, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorBraunisch, Matthias Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorFichtner, Falke-
dc.contributor.authorHolzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner Karl-
dc.contributor.authorKranke, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorSchaaf, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorSchmaderer, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorSeeber, Christian Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorWijnen‑Meijer, Marjo-
dc.contributor.authorMeerpohl, Jörg J.-
dc.contributor.authorSteckelberg, Anke-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T12:00:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-24T12:00:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/105045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. Results: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). Conclusions: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titlePublic information needs and preferences on COVID-19 : a cross-sectional studyeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBMC public health-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume23-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameBioMed Central-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLondon-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x-
local.subject.keywordsNeeds assessment, Consumer health information, Information dissemination, Information seeking behaviour, Pandemic-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn184343122X-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2023-
cbs.sru.importDate2023-04-24T11:59:21Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in BMC public health - London : BioMed Central, 2001-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12889-023-15131-x.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open