Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/108869
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner Karl-
dc.contributor.authorStadler, David-
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKranke, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorFichtner, Falke-
dc.contributor.authorSchmaderer, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorRenders, Lutz-
dc.contributor.authorBraunisch, Matthias Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorAssali, Tarek-
dc.contributor.authorPlaten, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorWijnen-Meijer, Marjo-
dc.contributor.authorLühnen, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorSteckelberg, Anke-
dc.contributor.authorPfadenhauer, Lisa Maria-
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Bernhard-
dc.contributor.authorFuetterer, Cornelia-
dc.contributor.authorSeeber, Christian Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorSchaaf, Christian P.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-06T11:52:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-06T11:52:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/110824-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/108869-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a flood of—often contradictory—evidence. HCWs had to develop strategies to locate information that supported their work. We investigated the information-seeking of different HCW groups in Germany. Methods: In December 2020, we conducted online surveys on COVID-19 information sources, strategies, assigned trustworthiness, and barriers—and in February 2021, on COVID-19 vaccination information sources. Results were analyzed descriptively; group comparisons were performed using 𝜒2-tests. Results: For general COVID-19-related medical information (413 participants), non-physicians most often selected official websites (57%), TV (57%), and e-mail/newsletters (46%) as preferred information sources—physicians chose official websites (63%), e-mail/newsletters (56%), and professional journals (55%). Non-physician HCWs used Facebook/YouTube more frequently. The main barriers were insufficient time and access issues. Non-physicians chose abstracts (66%), videos (45%), and webinars (40%) as preferred information strategy; physicians: overviews with algorithms (66%), abstracts (62%), webinars (48%). Information seeking on COVID-19 vaccination (2700 participants) was quite similar, however, with newspapers being more often used by non-physicians (63%) vs. physician HCWs (70%). Conclusion: Non-physician HCWs more often consulted public information sources. Employers/institutions should ensure the supply of professional, targeted COVID-19 information for different HCW groups.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleLocating medical information during an infodemic : information seeking behavior and strategies of health-care workers in Germanyeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleHealthcare-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume11-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue11-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend24-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameMDPI-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBasel-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3390/healthcare11111602-
local.subject.keywordsCOVID-19; infodemic; health-care workers; HCW; information strategies; emergency information-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1852094370-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2023-
cbs.sru.importDate2023-07-06T11:52:04Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Healthcare - Basel : MDPI, 2013-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
healthcare-11-01602.pdf3.73 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open