Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/110404
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi Hamidi, Somayeh-
dc.contributor.authorRezaei-Pandari, Mohammad-
dc.contributor.authorFakheran, Sima-
dc.contributor.authorFürst, Christine-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T11:41:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-13T11:41:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/112359-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/110404-
dc.description.abstractWomen are disadvantaged across all stages of academic publishing. In science, contribution to editorial boards of journals is evidence of a high reputation within a specialty or field. Therefore, the low presence of women on editorial boards can be considered a disadvantage indicator for women in academia. This study aims to highlight the gap in women’s contributions in land science journals. We assessed the gender composition of editorial boards in 60 peer-reviewed journals using systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and we obtained data on current and past editorial boards of these journals. The result shows that the current number of editorial board members is 5197 of which only 25.47 percent are women. Gender inequality is very evident in this group of journals to the extent that journals with a high impact factor indicate inequality that is even more than 75 percent. The results of the time series analysis have also shown that the presence of women on editorial boards has increased over the last decade, although this increase has been more in the Nordic countries. The geographical distribution of editorial board members is also quite unequal in the North and South, 83 percent of female editorial board members are from northern countries, while only 12 percent are from the global South. According to the results, there is still a long way to go to achieve gender equality, especially in the field of land science. Our results also support previous findings of a considerable gender difference in urban land science, geoscience community, biodiversity conservation, and veterinary sciences. Thus, the academic community, editors, and journals must take proactive measures to achieve gender balance.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc550-
dc.titleThe gender gap in land sciences : a review of women’s presence on the editorial boards of peer-reviewed journalseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleLand-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume11-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue11-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameMDPI-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBasel-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3390/land11111876-
local.subject.keywordsland sciences; women; peer-review journal; gender inequality; editorial board-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1859009891-
cbs.publication.displayform2022-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2022-
cbs.sru.importDate2023-09-13T11:41:20Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Land - Basel : MDPI, 2012-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
land-11-01876-v2.pdf4.07 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open