Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Karin-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Alexandre-
dc.contributor.authorGralla, Richard J.-
dc.contributor.authorJahn, Franziska-
dc.contributor.authorRapoport, Bernardo L.-
dc.contributor.authorRuhlmann, Christina H.-
dc.contributor.authorSayegh, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorHesketh, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:40:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:40:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/117229-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115274-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Our goal was to identify new anticancer agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medical Agency (EMA) since the 2016 MASCC/ESMO antiemetic update and classify their emetic potential. Methods: The MASCC/ESMO Expert Panel classified the emetogenicity of the identified new antineoplastic agents based on nonsystematic reviews of randomized controlled trials, analysis of product labeling, and evaluation of emetic classification in other international guidelines and informal consensus. The emetogenic classification system for oral anticancer agents was revised into two emetic risk categories (minimal–low; moderate–high) to be consistent with the system reported by ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) in their 2017 guideline update. The previously employed four emetic risk classification categories for intravenously administered antineoplastic agents were retained for this update. Results: From June 2015 to January 2023, 107 new antineoplastic agents (44 intravenously administered and 63 orally administered agents) were identified. The reported incidence of vomiting varied significantly across studies for many agents, especially for oral anticancer agents. Conclusion: The MASCC/ESMO Expert Panel acknowledges the limitations of our efforts to classify the emetic potential of anticancer agents, especially the imprecision associated with oral agents. However, we have attempted to provide a reasonable approximation of the emetic risk associated with new antineoplastic agents by searching the available literature and reviewing other available international antiemetic guidelines.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleEmetic risk classification and evaluation of the emetogenicity of antineoplastic agents : updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendationeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleSupportive care in cancer-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume53-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue32-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend7-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s00520-023-08220-5-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1883077028-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-03-11T10:39:34Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Supportive care in cancer - Berlin : Springer, 1993-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00520-023-08220-5.pdf374.59 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open