Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115407
Title: Facilitating comparable research in seedling functional ecologyhDaniel E. Winkler, Magda Garbowski, Kevin Kožić, Emma Ladouceur, Julie Larson, Sarah Martin, Christoph Rosche, Christiane Roscher, Mandy L. Slate, Lotte Korell
Author(s): Winkler, Daniel E.
Garbowski, Magda
Kožić, Kevin
Ladouceur, Emma
Larson, Julie
Martin, Sarah
Rosche, Christoph
Roscher, ChristianeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Slate, Mandy L.
Korell, Lotte
Issue Date: 2024
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Ecologists have worked to ascribe function to the variation found in plant populations, communities and ecosystems across environments for at least the past century. The vast body of research in functional ecology has drastically improved understanding of how individuals respond to their environment, communities are assembled and ecosystems function. However, with limited exceptions, few studies have quantified differences in plant function during the earliest stages of the plant life cycle, and fewer have tested how this early variability shapes populations, communities and ecosystems. Drawing from the literature and our collective experience, we describe the current state of knowledge in seedling functional ecology and provide examples of how this subdiscipline can enrich our fundamental understanding of plant function across levels of organisation. To inspire progressive work in this area, we also outline key considerations involved in seedling functional research (who, what, when, where and how to measure seedling traits) and identify remaining challenges and gaps in understanding around methodological approaches. Within this conceptual synthesis, we highlight three critical areas in seedling ecology for future research to target. First, given wide variation in the definition of a ‘seedling’, we provide a standard definition based on seed reserve dependence while emphasising the need to measure ontogenetic variation more clearly both within and following the seedling stage. Second, studies demonstrate that seedlings can be studied in multiple media (e.g. soil, agar, filter paper) and conditions (e.g. field, greenhouse, laboratory). We recommend that researchers select methods based on explicit goals, yet follow standard guidelines to reduce methodological noise across studies. Third, research is critically needed to assess the implications of different methodologies on trait measurement and compatibility across studies. By highlighting the importance of seedling functional ecology and suggesting pathways to address key challenges, we aim to inspire future research that generates useful and comparable data on seedling functional ecology. This work is critical to explain variation within and among populations, communities and ecosystems and integrate this most vulnerable stage of plant life into ecological frameworks.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/117361
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115407
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Methods in ecology and evolution
Publisher: Wiley
Publisher Place: Oxford [u.a.]
Volume: 15
Issue: 3
Original Publication: 10.1111/2041-210x.14288
Page Start: 464
Page End: 476
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU