Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/116992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHinz, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorBömicke, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorSchweyen, Ramona Maria-
dc.contributor.authorBensel, Tobias-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T07:14:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T07:14:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/118952-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/116992-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This follow-up study aimed at collecting long-term data for removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained by double crowns with spark-eroded friction pins (DCP) and comparing them in the presence of severely reduced dentition (SRD) and non-SRD (NSRD, i.e. residual dentition with more than three abutment teeth) after a 10-year wearing period. Materials and methods: A total of 158 participants (n = 71, 44.9% women) aged 62.5 ± 12.7 years with 182 prostheses on 520 abutment teeth were followed up between 2006 and 2022. The SRD group included 144 RPDs supported by 314 abutment teeth. The data collection was performed retrospectively. 10-year survival rates of RPDs and abutment teeth were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test for SRD and NSRD, among others. Cox regression analyses were conducted to isolate risk factors for the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. Results: The 10-year cumulative survival rate of all abutment teeth was 65.6% with significantly lower values in the SRD group (53.5%) (p < 0.001). The survival rate for all RPDs was 65.5%. The SRD group showed lower survival rates (57.9%) (p = 0.004). The number and location of the abutment teeth had a significant influence on the survival rates of the RPDs and the abutment teeth. Age, sex, jaw, relining, and vitality had a significant influence on the abutment teeth survival rates. Conclusions: RPDs showed an acceptable clinical survival rate after 10 years. The number, location, and vitality of abutment teeth were factors that influenced the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. Clinical relevance: Consideration of the influencing factors found can help improve the prognostic assessment of double crown-retained dentures in the context of prosthetic therapy planning.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleTen-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentition : a retrospective studyeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleClinical oral investigations-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume27-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1623-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend1635-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s00784-022-04788-0-
local.subject.keywordsPartial denture, double crowns, friction pins, survival rate, severely reduced dentition-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1860161057-
cbs.publication.displayform2023-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2023-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-05T07:13:52Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Clinical oral investigations - Berlin : Springer, 1997-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00784-022-04788-0.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open