Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117047
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeichgräber, Ulf-
dc.contributor.authorWienke, Andreas-
dc.contributor.author[und viele weitere]-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T07:47:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T07:47:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117047-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB). Materials and Methods: The EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants. Results: Kaplan–Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34). Conclusions: Primary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleLong-term effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon angioplasty : 5-year results of the randomized controlled EffPac trialeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleCardioVascular and interventional radiology-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume45-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1774-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend1783-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s00270-022-03265-1-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1907689745-
cbs.publication.displayform2022-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2022-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-06T07:46:46Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in CardioVascular and interventional radiology - Berlin : Springer, 1978-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00270-022-03265-1.pdf940.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open