Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117105
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeise, Solveig-
dc.contributor.authorDu, Yong-
dc.contributor.authorHeidemann, Christine-
dc.contributor.authorBaumert, Jens-
dc.contributor.authorFrese, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorHeise, Marcus-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-11T09:39:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-11T09:39:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119065-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117105-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Population-based studies of reasons for not participating in diabetes self-management education (DSME) are scarce. Therefore, we investigated what sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with participation in DSME, the reasons for not participating in DSME and how participants evaluate DSME. Research design and methods: We used data from the nationwide survey “Disease knowledge and information needs–Diabetes mellitus 2017”, which included a total of 1396 participants diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (diabetes; n = 394 DSME-participants, n = 1002 DSME-never-participants). Analyses used weighted logistic or multinominal regression analyses with bivariate and multivariable approaches. Results: Participants were more likely to attend DSME if they had a medium (OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21–2.73]),or high (OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30–3.21]) level of education, had type 1 diabetes (OR 2.46 [1.24–4.90]) and insulin treatment (OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33–2.90]). Participants were less likely to attend DSME if they lived in East Germany (OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39–0.83]), had diabetes for >2 to 5 years (OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31–0.88] compared to >5 years), did not agree that diabetes is a lifelong disease (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15–0.62], had never been encouraged by their physician to attend DSME (OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13–0.27]) and were not familiar with disease management programs (OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47–0.96]). The main reasons for non-participation were participant’s personal perception that DSME was not necessary (26.6%), followed by lack of recommendation from treating physician (25.7%) and lack of information on DSME (20.7%). DSME-participants found DSME more helpful if they had a medium educational level (OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10–3.89] ref: low level of education) and less helpful if they were never encouraged by their treatment team (OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26–0.82]). Discussion: Professionals treating persons with diabetes should encourage their patients to attend DSME and underline that diabetes is a lifelong disease. Overall, the majority of DSME participants rated DSME as helpful.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleDiabetes self-management education programs : results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participationeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitlePLOS ONE-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume19-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue9-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernamePLOS-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceSan Francisco, California, US-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0310338-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1906314845-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-11T09:38:57Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in PLOS ONE - San Francisco, California, US : PLOS, 2006-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0310338.pdf2.09 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open