Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117226
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAngulo, Javier C.-
dc.contributor.authorGiammó, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorQueißert, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorSchönburg, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Enguita, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorGonsior, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Francisco E.-
dc.contributor.authorAntunes-Lopes, Tiago-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Raquel-
dc.contributor.authorSzczesniewski, Juliusz-
dc.contributor.authorTéllez, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorRourke, Keith F.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T14:06:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-27T14:06:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117226-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS®) to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) in radiated patients compared with non-radiated patients, using propensity score-matching analysis to enhance the validity of the comparison. Patients and methods: Consecutive men with PPI treated with silicone-covered scrotal port ATOMS (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria) in nine different institutions between 2016 and 2022 were included. Preoperative assessment evaluated 24-h pad usage, urethroscopy and urodynamics, if indicated. Propensity score-matching analysis was based on age, length of follow-up, previous PPI treatment, previous bladder neck stricture, androgen deprivation and pad usage. The primary endpoint was dry rate, defined as no pads post-operatively with a security pad allowed. The secondary endpoints were complications, device removal and self-perceived satisfaction with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Results: Of the 710 included patients, 342 were matched, and the study groups were balanced for the baseline matched variables. The mean baseline 24-h pad was 4.8 in both groups (p = 0.48). The mean follow-up was 27.5 ± 18.6 months, which was also equivalent between groups (p = 0.36). The primary outcome was achieved in 73 (42.7%) radiated patients and in 115 (67.3%) non-radiated patients (p < 0.0001). The mean pad count at the last follow-up was 1.5 and 0.8, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in complications (p = 0.94), but surgical revision and device explant rates were higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively), and the proportion of patients highly satisfied (PGI-I = 1) was lower in the radiated group (p = 0.01). At sensitivity analysis, the study was found to be reasonably robust to hidden bias. Conclusion: ATOMS implantation significantly outperformed in patients without adjuvant radiation over radiated patients.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleThe effectiveness of adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) in radiated patients is reduced : a propensity score-matched analysiseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBJUI compass-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume5-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart506-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend514-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameWiley-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace[Hoboken, NJ]-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1002/bco2.329-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1885446446-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-27T14:04:58Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in BJUI compass - [Hoboken, NJ] : Wiley, 2020-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU