Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117362
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbera, Semaw Ferede-
dc.contributor.authorBedir, Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorGlowka, André-
dc.contributor.authorVordermark, Dirk-
dc.contributor.authorMedenwald, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T08:43:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-03T08:43:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119321-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117362-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study assesses the use of hormonal therapy to treat high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPCa) cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Methods: All N0-XM0 with ≥T3a, or PCa cases with poorly differentiated feature (equivalent to Gleason score ≥ 8), diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 were extracted from German population-based cancer registries. Cases treated by surgery or chemotherapy were excluded. Description of hormonal therapy use by HRLPCa cases’ profile was presented. Relative risk (RR) was computed with a log-link function to identify factors associated with hormonal therapy use among radiotherapy-treated HRLPCa cases. Results: A total of 5361 HRLPCa cases were analyzed. Only 27.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.4–28.8%) of the HRLPCa cases received hormonal therapy in combination with radiotherapy. The use of combined hormonal therapy and radiotherapy varied from 19.8% in Saxony to 47.8% in Schleswig-Holstein. Application of hormonal therapy was higher for the locally advanced cases compared to the poorly differentiated cases (relative risk [RR] = 1.28; 95%CI: 1.19, 1.37). Older patients showed a slightly increased use of hormonal therapy (RR for a 10-year age increase = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.02, 1.16). Compared to PCa cases from the most affluent residential areas, cases from the least affluent (RR = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.55, 0.92) and medium (RR = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.58, 0.96) areas had decreased use of hormonal therapy. The introduction of the German S3-guideline did not make a marked difference in the uptake of both hormonal therapy and radiotherapy (RR = 1.02; 95%CI: 0.95, 1.09). Conclusion: This study found a low use of hormonal therapy among HRLPCa patients treated without surgery. The introduction of the German S3-guideline for prostate cancer treatment does not seem to have impacted hormonal therapy use.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleSuboptimal use of hormonal therapy among German men with localized high-risk prostate cancer during 2005 to 2015 : analysis of registry dataeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBMC cancer-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume22-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameBioMed Central-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLondon-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1186/s12885-022-09677-z-
local.subject.keywordshormonal therapy, high-risk, prostate cancer, treatment, cancer registry, S3-guideline, Germany-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1876903384-
cbs.publication.displayform2022-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2022-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-12-03T08:43:11Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in BMC cancer - London : BioMed Central, 2001-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12885-022-09677-z.pdf2.21 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open