Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117810
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Langsdorf, Leif E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Darnstaedt, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schubert, Torsten | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-08T12:08:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-08T12:08:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119770 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117810 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In dual-task (DT) situations, performance deteriorates compared with single-task situations. Such performance decrements are frequently explained with the serial scheduling of the response selection stages constituting a bottleneck. Proof of this assumption stems from the observation that response times for the second task (task 2; RT 2) increase with decreasing stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA). In this study, we investigated how the reward prospect for task 1 performance affects task 1 and task 2 processing. For that purpose, we relied on the psychological refractory period paradigm (PRP) as a chronometric tool, to determine the locus of the reward effect in the processing chain of both tasks. We obtained improved task 1 and task 2 performance; as indicated by reduced RTs in the reward compared to the no reward condition of task 1 and task 2. Furthermore, the reward effect propagated at short SOA from task 1 onto task 2, suggesting that the locus of the reward effect can be pinpointed before or at the bottleneck of task 1. Importantly, the mean reward effect on task 1 was increased compared to task 2, thus indicating that parts of the reward effect were not propagated onto task 2, therefore affecting task 1 motor processes. In Experiment 2, we tested for the locus of the effect propagation to task 2. Therefore, we implemented a difficulty manipulation of the response selection of task 2. The results indicate that the reward effect is propagated from task 1 onto the response selection stage of task 2. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 150 | - |
dc.title | On the localization of reward effects in overlapping dual tasks | eng |
dc.type | Article | - |
local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Psychological research | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 89 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | Springer | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | Berlin | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1007/s00426-024-02054-4 | - |
local.openaccess | true | - |
dc.identifier.ppn | 191178028X | - |
cbs.publication.displayform | 2024 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2024 | - |
cbs.sru.importDate | 2025-01-08T12:07:17Z | - |
local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in Psychological research - Berlin : Springer, 1921 | - |
local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s00426-024-02054-4.pdf | 2.06 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |