Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117962
Title: | Strategies for advancing inclusive biodiversity research through equitable practices and collective responsibility |
Author(s): | Valdez, Jose Damasceno, Gabriella Oh, Rachel R. Y. Uribe, Laura Catalina Quintero Barajas Barbosa, Martha Paola Amado, Talita Ferreira Schmidt, Chloé Fernandez, Miguel Sharma, Sandeep |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Abstract: | Biodiversity research is essential for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, necessitating diverse participation and perspectives of researchers from a wide range of backgrounds. However, conservation faces a significant inclusivity problem because local expertise from biodiversity-rich but economically disadvantaged regions is often underrepresented. This underrepresentation is driven by linguistic bias, undervalued contributions, parachute science practices, and capacity constraints. Although fragmented solutions exist, a unified multistakeholder approach is needed to address the interconnected and systemic conservation issues. We devised a holistic framework of collective responsibility across all research participants and tailored strategies that embrace diversity and dismantle systemic barriers to equitable collaboration. This framework delineates the diverse actors and practices required for promoting inclusivity in biodiversity research, assigning clear responsibilities to researchers, publishers, institutions, and funding bodies. Strategies for researchers include cultivating self-awareness, expanding literature searches, fostering partnerships with local experts, and promoting knowledge exchange. For institutions, we recommend establishing specialized liaison roles, implementing equitable policies, allocating resources for diversity initiatives, and enhancing support for international researchers. Publishers can facilitate multilingual dissemination, remove financial barriers, establish inclusivity standards, and ensure equitable representation in peer review. Funders must remove systemic barriers, strengthen research networks, and prioritize equitable resource allocation. Implementing these stakeholder-specific strategies can help dismantle deep-rooted biases and structural inequities in biodiversity research, catalyzing a shift toward a more inclusive and representative model that amplifies diverse perspectives and maximizes collective knowledge for effective global conservation. |
URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119922 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117962 |
Open Access: | Open access publication |
License: | (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 |
Journal Title: | Conservation biology |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
Publisher Place: | Oxford [u.a.] |
Volume: | 38 |
Issue: | 6 |
Original Publication: | 10.1111/cobi.14325 |
Page Start: | 1 |
Page End: | 13 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
cobi-14325.pdf | 654.83 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |