Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118007
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCosson, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorAuzanneau, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorAguayo, Gloria A.-
dc.contributor.authorKarges, Wolfram-
dc.contributor.authorRiveline, Jean-Pierre-
dc.contributor.authorAugstein, Petra-
dc.contributor.authorSablone, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorJehle, Peter M.-
dc.contributor.authorFagherazzi, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorHoll, Reinhard W.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T12:45:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-04T12:45:14Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119966-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118007-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction & objectives: To evaluate whether cardiovascular risk factors and their management differ in primary prevention between adult males and females with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in two European countries in 2020–2022 and sex inequalities in achievement of standards of care in diabetes. Methods: We used 2020–2022 data of patients without a cardiovascular history in the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up registry (DPV) centres, in Germany, and the Société Francophone du Diabète– Cohorte Diabète de Type 1 cohort (SFDT1), in France. Results: We included 2,657 participants from the DPV registry and 1,172 from the SFDT1 study. Body mass indexes were similar in females and males with similar proportions of HbA1c < 7% (DPV: 36.6 vs 33.0%, p = 0.06, respectively; SFDT1: 23.4 vs 25.7%, p = 0.41). Females were less overweight compared to men in DPV (55.4 vs 61.0%, p < 0.01) but not in SFDT1 (48.0 vs 44.9%, p = 0.33) and were less prone to smoke (DPV: 19.7 vs 25.8%, p < 0.01; SFDT1: 21.0 vs 26.0%, p = 0.07). Systolic blood pressure was lower in females than males with a higher rate of antihypertensive therapy in case of hypertension in females in DPV (70.5 vs 63.7%, p = 0.02) but not in SFDT1 (73.3 vs 68.6%, p = 0.64). In the case of microalbuminuria, ACEi-ARB were less often prescribed in women than men in DPV (21.4 vs 37.6%, p < 0.01) but not SFDT1 (73.3 vs 67.5.0%, p = 0.43). In females compared to males, HDL-cholesterol levels were higher; triglycerides were lower in both countries. In those with LDL-cholesterol > 3.4 mmol/L (DPV: 19.9 (females) vs 23.9% (males), p = 0.01; SFDT1 17.0 vs 19.2%, p = 0.43), statin therapy was less often prescribed in females than males in DPV (7.9 vs 17.0%, p < 0.01), SFDT1 (18.2 vs 21.0%, p = 0.42). Conclusion: In both studies, females in primary prevention have a better cardiovascular risk profile than males. We observed a high rate of therapeutic inertia, which might be higher in females for statin treatment and nephroprotection with ACEi-ARB, especially in Germany. Diabetologists should be aware of sex-specific differences in the management of cardiorenal risk factors to develop more personalized prevention strategies.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleSex inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors and their management in primary prevention in adults living with type 1 diabetes in Germany and France : findings from DPV and SFDT1eng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleCardiovascular diabetology-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume23-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameBioMed Central-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLondon-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi0.1186/s12933-024-02419-4-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1905348487-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2025-02-04T12:44:34Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Cardiovascular diabetology - London : BioMed Central, 2002-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12933-024-02419-4.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open