Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118052
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnöchelmann, Anja-
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorFrese, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorKantelhardt, Eva Johanna-
dc.contributor.authorMikolajczyk, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Gabriele-
dc.contributor.authorSchildmann, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorSteckelberg, Anke-
dc.contributor.authorHerke, Max-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T11:31:33Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-05T11:31:33Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118052-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is evidence of different use by different groups of people for general health-related applications. Yet, these findings are lacking for digitalized healthcare services. It is also unclear whether typical use patterns can be found and how user types can be characterized. Methods: The analyses are based on data from 1 821 respondents to the Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany panel (HeReCa). Digitalized healthcare services, that were used to determine the user types, include for example sick notes before/after examination and disease related training. User types were determined by latent class analysis. Individual groups were characterized using multinomial logistic regressions, taking into account socioeconomic and demographic factors as well as individual attitudes towards digitalization in the healthcare system. Results: Three types were identified: rejecting (27.9%), potential (53.8%) and active (18.3%). Active participants were less likely to be employed, less likely to be highly educated and less skeptical of digital technologies. Potential users were the youngest, most highly-educated and most frequently employed group, with less skepticism than those who rejected. Rejecters were the oldest group, more likely to be female and of higher socio-economic status. Conclusions: Socio-demographic and socio-economic differences were identified among three user types. It can therefore be assumed that not all population groups will benefit from the trend towards digitalization in healthcare. Steps should be taken to enhance access to innovations and ensure that everyone benefits from them.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleUser profiles in digitalized healthcare : active, potential, and rejecting - a cross-sectional study using latent class analysiseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBMC health services research-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume24-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameBioMed Central-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLondon-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1186/s12913-024-11523-w-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1905876009-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2025-02-05T11:30:55Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in BMC health services research - London : BioMed Central, 2001-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12913-024-11523-w.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open