Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118054
Title: Climate-sensitive health counselling in Germany : a cross-sectional study about previous participation and preferences in the general public
Author(s): Kippl, Nicola
Mezger, Nikolaus Christian SimonLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Danquah, InaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Nieder, JessicaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Griesel, SilvanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schildmann, JanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Mikolajczyk, RafaelLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kantelhardt, Eva JohannaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Herrmann, AlinaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2024
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: In response to climate change (CC), medicine needs to consider new aspects in health counselling of patients. Such climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) may include counselling patients on preventing and coping with climate-sensitive diseases or on leading healthy and climate-friendly lifestyles. This study aimed to identify previous participation in and preferences for CSHC as well as associated sociodemographic and attitudinal factors among the general public in Germany. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a population-based online panel in five German federal states (04–06/2022). We performed descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analysis to assess prior participation in CSHC and content preferences regarding CSHC, as well as associations between sociodemographic variables and general preference for CSHC. Results: Among 1491 participants (response rate 47.1%), 8.7% explicitly reported having participated in CSHC, while 39.9% had discussed at least one CSHC-related topic with physicians. In the studied sample, 46.7% of participants would like CSHC to be part of the consultation with their physician, while 33.9% rejected this idea. Participants aged 21 to 40 years (versus 51 to 60), individuals alarmed about CC (versus concerned/cautious/disengaged/doubtful/dismissive), and those politically oriented to the left (vs. centre or right) showed greater preference for CSHC in the multivariable regression model. Most participants wanted to talk about links to their personal health (65.1%) as opposed to links to the health of all people (33.2%). Conclusions: Almost half of the participants in this sample would like to receive CSHC, especially those who are younger, more alarmed about CC and more politically oriented to the left. More research and training on patient-centred implementation of CSHC is needed.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120013
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118054
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: BMC public health
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher Place: London
Volume: 24
Original Publication: 10.1186/s12889-024-18998-6
Page Start: 1
Page End: 11
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12889-024-18998-6.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open