Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118741
Title: Oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chains : Competing parameters or complementary biomarkers?
Author(s): Konen, Franz FelixLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Wurster, Ulrich
Schwenkenbecher, PhilippLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Gerritzen, AndreasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Groß, Catharina ChristianeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Eichhorn, Peter
Harrer, AndreaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Isenmann, StefanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Lewczuk, PiotrLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Lewerenz, JanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Leypoldt, FrankLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Otto, MarkusLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2025
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: The 2024-revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) proposed to incorporate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-specific oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chains (KFLC) as diagnostic biomarkers. While the 2017-revised criteria highlighted CSF-specific oligoclonal bands to indicate intrathecal IgG synthesis, significantly enhancing early MS diagnosis, KFLC have emerged as additional marker. Now, the question rises of whether both biomarkers serve as competing or complementary tools in MS diagnostics. Methods: In this narrative review, we extensively searched the literature on oligoclonal bands and KFLC determination in CSF and serum across neurological disorders, with a focus on MS, using the PubMed database to demonstrate the complementarity of both biomarkers. Results: Oligoclonal bands have long been a reliable marker of intrathecal IgG synthesis in MS, valued for their high diagnostic sensitivity, unique patient “fingerprints,” clonality differentiation, semi-quantitative analysis, and pre-analytic robustness. However, they present challenges in standardization, labor-intensity, method variability, examiner dependency, and limited data on non-IgG immunoglobulins. Quantitative KFLC measurement provides rapid, examiner-independent, and cost-effective assessment across all immunoglobulin classes but might have lower specificity, lacked consensus on standardized interpretation in recent years, and is not yet supported by comprehensive prospective multinational studies on its prognostic role. Conclusion: Both oligoclonal bands and KFLC have unique strengths and limitations that complement each other, potentially serving as complementary markers for evaluating intrathecal Ig synthesis in MS diagnosis. Further evidence is needed to establish the value of KFLC in MS diagnosis, thus multicenter prospective studies are being conducted to compare the diagnostic utility of both markers.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120699
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118741
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Autoimmunity reviews
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Publisher Place: Amsterdam [u.a.]
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Original Publication: 10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103765
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1568997225000254-main.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open