Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119034
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, Sören-
dc.contributor.authorSunderkötter, Cord-
dc.contributor.authorMich, Christiane-
dc.contributor.author[und viele weitere]-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T08:22:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T08:22:57Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120990-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119034-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Melanoma is the main cause of skin cancer-related death. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has improved the prognosis in recent years. However, subtypes of melanoma differ in their response. Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) has a worse prognosis compared to cutaneous melanoma other than ALM (CM) and is therefore of particular relevance. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of CPI in first-line treatment of patients with advanced ALM compared CM. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic ALM (n = 45) or CM (n = 328) who received first-line CPI therapy from the multicenter prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG. Study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: ALM patients had significantly higher rates of ulcerated tumors, loco regional metastases and fewer BRAF-mutated tumors compared to CM patients. Combined CPI was administered in 48.9 % ALM patients and 39.3 % of CM patients, while the remaining patients received PD-1 monotherapy. OS trended to be shorter in patients with ALM (18.1 vs. 43.8 months, p = 0.10) with no significant differences in PFS (7.0 vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.21). In patients with CM, median OS with combined CPI was not reached, whereas the median OS after PD- 1 monotherapy was 37.8 months (p = 0.22). Conversely, in patients with ALM, OS with combined CPI was 17.8 months, compared to 26 months with PD-1 monotherapy (p = 0.15). There were no significant differences in BOR between patients with ALM or CM. Conclusion: Analysis of this real-world cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma showed a trend towards poorer survival outcomes upon first-line treatment with CPI in ALM compared to cutaneous melanoma of other subtypes.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleFirst-line checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic acral lentiginous melanoma compared to other types of cutaneous melanoma : a multicenter study from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREGeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleEuropean journal of cancer-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume220-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend10-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameElsevier-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceAmsterdam [u.a.]-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115356-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1926689909-
cbs.publication.displayform2025-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2025-
cbs.sru.importDate2025-05-27T08:22:27Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in European journal of cancer - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0959804925001376-main.pdf3.13 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open