Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119329
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStadlbauer, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorHoyer, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorTongers, Jörn-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-26T14:01:41Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-26T14:01:41Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/121287-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119329-
dc.description.abstractHigh-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition necessitating hemodynamic stabilization and rapid restoration of pulmonary perfusion. In this context, evidence regarding the benefit of advanced circulatory support and pulmonary recanalization strategies is still limited. In this observational study, we assessed data of 1060 patients treated for high-risk acute PE with 991 being included in a target trial emulation to investigate all-cause in-hospital mortality estimates with different advanced treatment strategies. The four treatment groups consisted of patients undergoing (I) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) alone (n = 126), (II) intrahospital systemic thrombolysis (SYS) (n = 643), (III) surgical thrombectomy (ST) (n = 49), and (IV) percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (PCDT) (n = 173). VA-ECMO was allowed as bridging to pulmonary recanalization in groups II, III, and IV. Marginal causal contrasts were estimated using the g-formula with logistic regression models as the primary approach. Sensitivity analyses included targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) with machine learning, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), as well as variations of estimands, handling of missing values, and a complete target trial emulation excluding the VA-ECMO alone group. In the overall target trial population, the median age was 62.0 years, and 53.3% of patients were male. The estimated probability of in-hospital mortality from the primary target trial intention-to-treat analysis for VA-ECMO alone was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47%; 67%), compared to 48% (95% CI 44%; 53%) for intrahospital SYS, 34% (95%CI 18%; 50%) for ST, and 43% (95% CI 35%; 51%) for PCDT. The mortality risk ratios were largely in favor of any advanced recanalization strategy over VA-ECMO alone. The robustness of these findings was supported by all sensitivity analyses. In the crude outcome analysis, patients surviving to discharge had a high probability of favorable neurologic outcome in all treatment groups. Advanced recanalization by means of SYS, ST, and several promising catheter-directed systems may have a positive impact on short-term survival of patients presenting with high-risk PE compared to the use of VA-ECMO alone as a bridge to recovery.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleManagement of high‑risk acute pulmonary embolism : an emulated target trial analysiseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleIntensive care medicine-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume51-
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart490-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend505-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s00134-025-07805-4-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1921886889-
cbs.publication.displayform2025-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2025-
cbs.sru.importDate2025-06-26T13:48:46Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Intensive care medicine - Berlin : Springer, 1975-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00134-025-07805-4.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open