Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120822
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBonato, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorBurian, Alfred-
dc.contributor.authorEquihua, Juliàn A.-
dc.contributor.authorCord, Anna F.-
dc.contributor.authorBartkowski, Bartosz-
dc.contributor.authorStrauch, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-15T05:41:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-15T05:41:21Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/122777-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120822-
dc.description.abstractThe implementation of agri-environmental practices (AEPs) is a key strategy to reach biodiversity and environmental objectives in agricultural landscapes, but their widespread application is often hampered by perceived trade-offs with crop production. However, the extent of these trade-offs remains poorly understood and has rarely been quantified in real-world case studies. Hence, our aim was to analyze trade-offs between crop yield, water quality and farmland biodiversity using an optimization approach for the spatial allocation of AEPs for a catchment in Eastern Germany. Potential AEPs were selected based on a co design approach with local stakeholders (stakeholder-based scenario) and were complemented by additional AEPs to reach current EU policies targets (policy-based scenarios). Consequences for crop production and environmental objectives were evaluated through spatially-explicit crop, water and biodiversity models. Contrary to common perception, we found that crop losses required to increase environmental objectives were marginal (maximum loss of 1.1% in the stakeholder based scenario). The implementation of AEPs even led to win-win outcomes for crop production and environmental objectives in over 20% of the Pareto-optimal solutions as compared to the status quo. These win-win outcomes resulted merely from biophysical effects as positive biodiversity feedbacks to agriculture were not included in our model. Spatial optimization of AEPs allocation was key to mediating trade-offs across scenarios, highlighting the large potential of spatially explicit approaches for the management of agricultural landscapes.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc550-
dc.titleMinimizing trade-offs in agricultural landscapes through optimal spatial allocation of agri-environmental practiceseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of environmental management-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume393-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameElsevier-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceAmsterdam [u.a.]-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126939-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1935946633-
cbs.publication.displayform2025-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2025-
cbs.sru.importDate2025-10-15T05:40:43Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Journal of environmental management - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1990-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0301479725029159-main.pdf8.66 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open