Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120864
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Destaw, Alemnew | - |
dc.contributor.author | Getachew Kelbore, Sefonias | - |
dc.contributor.author | Getachew, Eyerusalem | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shita, Abel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Midaksa, Miresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rossner, Sophie Sarah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kröber, Eric Sven | - |
dc.contributor.author | Addissie, Adamu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gizaw, Muluken | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-16T10:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-10-16T10:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/122820 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120864 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective To assess cervical cancer screening positivity rates, follow-up rescreening uptake 1 year after treatment and persistent positivity among women with initial positive screening results in Ethiopia. The study also explored reasons for loss to follow-up and preferences for reminder strategies. Design Longitudinal cross-sectional study. Settings 10 primary healthcare facilities in Oromia and southern and central Ethiopia. Participants From November 2022 to April 2024, 17 586 women screened for cervical cancer. Of these 768 (4.4%) had positive screening results, and 515 women treated at the primary level were included to assess follow-up rescreening uptake. An additional 139 women who did not return for follow-up were interviewed to identify reasons for non-uptake and reminder preferences. Result Of the 515 women included in the analysis, 179 (34.8%, 95% CI: 30.6% to 38.8%) returned for follow-up rescreening. Among those re-screened, the persistent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) positivity rate was 16.1% (95% CI: 11.0% to 21.7%). Factors significantly associated with follow-up rescreening uptake included age over 40 (adjusted OR (AOR): 2.5; 95% CI: 1.34 to 5.00), urban residence (AOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.58), secondary or higher education (AOR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.06 to 4.12) and HIV-positive status (AOR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.27 to 4.87). Among the 139 women contacted, the main reasons for non-uptake were lack of time, forgetting appointments, visiting another facility and pregnancy. Regarding preferred reminders, 93% favoured text messages and all agreed to phone calls or home visits. Conclusion One-third of women adhered to follow-up rescreening after a positive cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia, revealing a considerable gap since those women had a three times higher chance of being VIA positive compared with the first screening. Older age, urban residence, higher education and HIV-positive status were significantly linked to follow-up rescreening uptake. Addressing barriers such as time constraints and forgotten appointments through tailored reminder strategies is essential for improving the follow-up rescreening uptake. Contextualised interventions can strengthen rescreening for finding those women at very high risk for cervical lesions and strengthen cervical cancer prevention in Ethiopia. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 610 | - |
dc.title | Follow-up rescreening uptake and persistent positive rates among women after positive cervical cancer screening results in Ethiopia : a longitudinal cross-sectional study | eng |
dc.type | Article | - |
local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | BMJ open | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 15 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 7 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | BMJ Publishing Group | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | London | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099955 | - |
local.openaccess | true | - |
dc.identifier.ppn | 1932418520 | - |
cbs.publication.displayform | 2025 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2025 | - |
cbs.sru.importDate | 2025-10-16T10:03:57Z | - |
local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in BMJ open - London : BMJ Publishing Group, 2011 | - |
local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e099955.full.pdf | 374.76 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |