Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121835
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAngelara, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorPapachristou, Klairi-
dc.contributor.authorPapatheodoridi, Margarita-
dc.contributor.authorNasiri-Ansari, Narjes-
dc.contributor.authorKaragiannakis, Dimitrios S.-
dc.contributor.authorAndroutsakos, Theodoros-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-14T07:46:47Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-14T07:46:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/123784-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121835-
dc.description.abstractPrimary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic disease with a female predominance and a long disease duration. The pathogenesis of PBC is still unclear; however, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, alongside immune dysregulation, seem to lead to a dysfunction of the biliary ‘bicarbonate umbrella’ and increased biliary epithelial cells apoptosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the treatment of choice for PBC since its approval back in 1994; however, a percentage varying from 15-40% of all patients fail to achieve biochemical response or alkaline phosphatase normalization. Obeticholic acid, though promising at first, failed to show benefit after long-term use and was retracted from the market. Two peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor agonists (PPARs) have recently been approved for use in patients with PBC, showing biochemical response in non-responders and improvement of pruritus. However, a substantial percentage of patients fail to achieve serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin normalization; as a result, many drugs with different mechanisms of action are in phase 2 or 3 trials. The aim of this review is to present available data regarding PBC treatment and explain the pathogenetic pathway each one targets.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titlePrimary biliary cholangitis : treatment options in 2025 : a narrative revieweng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleFrontiers in immunology-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume16-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend14-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameFrontiers Media-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceLausanne-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3389/fimmu.2025.1698833-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1948697289-
cbs.publication.displayform2025-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2025-
cbs.sru.importDate2026-01-14T07:46:24Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Frontiers in immunology - Lausanne : Frontiers Media, 2010-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fimmu-16-1698833.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open