Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122580
Title: Aspiration, stent retriever, or combined approach for basilar artery occlusion : a three-way comparative analysis
Author(s): Jaffar, Muhammad
Ahmed, Kazi
Abu Rumeileh, SamirLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Otto, MarkusLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Barba, LorenzoLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Nguyen, Thanh N.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Abdalkader, MohamadLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Klein, Piers
Issue Date: 2026
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a rare but devastating form of ischaemic stroke, with high rates of disability and mortality. While randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in BAO, the optimal first-line technique – aspiration, stent retriever, or a combined approach – remains undefined. Objectives: This multicentre study aimed to provide a three-way comparison of MT techniques in terms of efficacy, safety and subgroup-specific outcomes. Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: We prospectively included 517 consecutive patients with acute isolated BAO treated with MT across seven comprehensive stroke centres between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were grouped by first-line technique: aspiration (n = 200), stent retriever (n = 260), or combined approach (n = 57). The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome at 90 days (mRS 0–3). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted for baseline imbalances. Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization, excellent outcome (mRS 0–1), functional independence (mRS 0–2), mortality, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and haemorrhagic transformation (HT). Predefined subgroup analyses were performed. Results: After adjustment, 90-day outcomes were similar across groups. Stent retrievers achieved higher recanalization rates (RR 1.86 vs aspiration, p < 0.001), while the combined technique was associated with less HT (RR 0.39 vs aspiration, p = 0.008). In patients ⩾80 years, stent-retriever use led to better outcomes than aspiration (39.2% vs 18%; p = 0.021). No other significant subgroup interactions were found. Conclusion: While overall functional outcomes were comparable, stent retrievers yielded superior recanalization and the combined technique reduced haemorrhagic complications. Technique selection may benefit from individualized, anatomy-driven decision-making. Randomized studies are warranted.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/124526
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122580
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
Publisher: Sage
Publisher Place: London [u.a.]
Volume: 29
Original Publication: 10.1177/17562864251410787
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU