Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/85847
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPiot, Niels-
dc.contributor.authorSchweiger, Oliver-
dc.contributor.authorMeeus, Ivan-
dc.contributor.authorYañez, Orlando-
dc.contributor.authorStraub, Lars-
dc.contributor.authorVillamar-Bouza, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorDe la Rúa, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorJara, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorMalmstrøm, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Anders-
dc.contributor.authorMänd, Marika-
dc.contributor.authorKarise, Reet-
dc.contributor.authorTlak-Gajger, Ivana-
dc.contributor.authorÖzgör, Erkay-
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Nevin-
dc.contributor.authorDiévart, Virginie-
dc.contributor.authorDalmon, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorGajda, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorSmagghe, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorGraystock, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorRadzevičiūtė, Rita-
dc.contributor.authorPaxton, Robert J.-
dc.contributor.authorde Miranda, Joachim R.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T06:22:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-17T06:22:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/87799-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/85847-
dc.description.abstractViruses are omnipresent, yet the knowledge on drivers of viral prevalence in wild host populations is often limited. Biotic factors, such as sympatric managed host species, as well as abiotic factors, such as climatic variables, are likely to impact viral prevalence. Managed and wild bees, which harbor several multi-host viruses with a mostly fecal–oral between-species transmission route, provide an excellent system with which to test for the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on viral prevalence in wild host populations. Here we show on a continental scale that the prevalence of three broad host viruses: the AKI-complex (Acute bee paralysis virus, Kashmir bee virus and Israeli acute paralysis virus), Deformed wing virus, and Slow bee paralysis virus in wild bee populations (bumble bees and solitary bees) is positively related to viral prevalence of sympatric honey bees as well as being impacted by climatic variables. The former highlights the need for good beekeeping practices, including Varroa destructor management to reduce honey bee viral infection and hive placement. Furthermore, we found that viral prevalence in wild bees is at its lowest at the extreme ends of both temperature and precipitation ranges. Under predicted climate change, the frequency of extremes in precipitation and temperature will continue to increase and may hence impact viral prevalence in wild bee communities.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipPublikationsfonds MLU-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc595-
dc.titleHoney bees and climate explain viral prevalence in wild bee communities on a continental scaleeng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleScientific reports-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume12-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameMacmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace[London]-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1038/s41598-022-05603-2-
local.openaccesstrue-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s41598-022-05603-2.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open