Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101786
Title: Comparing post-exercise hypotension after different sprint interval training protocols in a matched sample of younger and older adults
Author(s): Ketelhut, SaschaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Möhle, MartinLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Gürlich, Tina
Hottenrott, LauraLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Hottenrott, KunoLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2023
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: This study assessed the post-exercise hypotension (PEH) effect in a sample of matched young and older adults after different sprint interval training (SIT) protocols. From forty-three participants enrolled in this study, twelve younger (24 ± 3 years) and 12 older (50 ± 7 years) participants, matched for the body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and VO2max-percentiles, were selected. The participants completed two SIT protocols consisting of 4 × 30 s exercise bouts interspersed by either one (SIT1) or three minutes (SIT3) of active rest. The peripheral systolic (pSBP) and diastolic (pDBP) blood pressure, central systolic (cSBP) and diastolic (cDBP) blood pressure, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and heart rate (HR) were obtained before and at different measurement time points (t5, t15, t30, t45) after the exercise. No significant time × group interactions were detected in pSBP (p = 0.242, η² = 0.060), pDBP (p = 0.379, η² = 0.046), cSBP (p = 0.091, η² = 0.861), cDBP (p = 0.625, η² = 0.033), PWV (p = 0.133, η² = 0.076), and HR (p = 0.190, η² = 0.123) after SIT1. For SIT3 no significant time × group interactions could be detected for pSBP (p = 0.773, η² = 0.020), pDBP (p = 0.972, η² = 0.006), cSBP (p = 0.239, η² = 0.060), cDBP (p = 0.535, η² = 0.036), PWV (p = 0.402, η² = 0.044), and HR (p = 0.933, η² = 0.009). Matched samples of young and older adults reveal similar PEH effects after HIIT. Accordingly, age does not seem to affect PEH after SIT. These results show that rest interval length and age modulate the PEH effect after SIT.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/103733
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101786
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Original Publication: 10.3390/jcm12020640
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jcm-12-00640.pdf660.23 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open