Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101797
Title: Coping self-efficacy and its relationship with psychological morbidity after genetic test result disclosure : results from cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers
Author(s): Isselhard, Anna
Lautz, Zoe
Töpper, Maren
Rhiem, Kerstin E. M.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schmutzler, RitaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Vitinius, FrankLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Fischer, HannahLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Berger-Höger, BirteLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Steckelberg, AnkeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Beifus, Karolina
Köberlein-Neu, JulianeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Stock, StephanieLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2023
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Women who are found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant experience psychological distress due to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They may decide between different preventive options. In this secondary analysis of data collected alongside a larger randomized controlled trial, we are looking at 130 newly found BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and how their coping self-efficacy immediately after genetic test result disclosure is related to their psychological burden and status of preventive decision making. Participants received the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Impact of Event Scale, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Stage of Decision-Making Scale after positive genetic test result disclosure. We found that women with higher coping self-efficacy showed fewer symptoms of anxiety or depression and were less affected by receiving the genetic test result in terms of post-traumatic stress. However, coping self-efficacy had no relationship with any decision-related criteria, such as decisional conflict or stage of decision making. This shows that despite its buffering capacity on psychological burden, possessing coping self-efficacy does not lead to more decisiveness in preference-sensitive decisions.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/103744
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/101797
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: International journal of environmental research and public health
Publisher: MDPI AG
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Original Publication: 10.3390/ijerph20031684
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-20-01684.pdf358.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open