Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/110386
Title: Preventive Impella® support in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery
Author(s): Benke, KálmánLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Korça, Edina
Boltjes, Anniek
Stengl, Roland
Hofmann, BrittLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Matin, MeradjoddinLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Krohe, KatharinaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Yakobus, Yuliana
Michaelsen, Jens KerstenLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Khizaneishvili, LevanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Szabó, Gábor
Veres, GáborLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2022
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: Patients with severely reduced LV-EF ≤ 30% undergoing CABG have a high risk for postoperative cardiogenic shock. The optimal timing of an adequate hemodynamic support has an impact on short- and midterm mortality after CABG. This study aimed to assess the prophylactic use of the Impella pump in high-risk patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 14 patients with LV-EF (≤30%) undergoing cardiac surgery received a prophylactic, perioperative Impella (5.0, 5.5) support between 2020 and 2022. Results: The mean age at surgery was 64.2 ± 2.6 years, the mean preoperative LV-EF was 20.7% ± 1.56%. The duration of Impella support was 4 (3–7.8) days and the 30-day survival rate was 92.85%. Acute renal failure occurred in four patients who were dialyzed on average for 1.2 ± 0.7 days. Mechanical ventilation was needed for 1.75 (0.9–2.7) days. Time to inotrope/vasopressor independence was 2 (0.97–7.25) days with a highest lactate level (24 h postoperatively) of 3.8 ± 0.6 mmol/l. Postoperative LV-EF showed a significant improvement when compared to preoperative LV-EF (29.1% ± 2.6% vs. 20.7% ± 1.56% (p = 0.022)). Conclusion: The prophylactic Impella application seems to be a safe approach to improve the outcomes of this patient population.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/112341
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/110386
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 11
Issue: 18
Original Publication: 10.3390/jcm11185404
Page Start: 1
Page End: 7
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jcm-11-05404.pdf245.41 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open