Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/111945
Title: Expert-approved best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care (SedPall)
Author(s): Ostgathe, ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Bausewein, ClaudiaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schildmann, EvaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Bazata, Jeremias
Handtke, VioletLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Heckel, Maria
Klein, CarstenLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kremling, AlexanderLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kurkowski, SandraLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Meesters, SophieLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Seifert, Andreas
Torres Cavazos, Jorge Luis
Ziegler, Kerstin
Jäger, Christian
Schildmann, JanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2023
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: The use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in end-of-life care is associated with clinical, ethical and legal challenges. In view of these and of the issue’s great importance to patients undergoing intolerable suffering, we conducted a project titled SedPall (“From anxiolysis to deep continuous sedation – Development of recommendations for sedation in palliative care“) with the purpose of developing best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and obtaining feedback and approval from experts in this area. Design: Our stepwise approach entailed drafting the recommendations, obtaining expert feedback, conducting a single-round Delphi study, and convening a consensus conference. As an interdisciplinary group, we created a set of best practice recommendations based on previously published guidance and empirical and normative analysis, and drawing on feedback from experts, including patient representatives and of public involvement participants. We set the required agreement rate for approval at the single-round Delphi and the consensus conference at ≥80%. Results: Ten experts commented on the recommendations’ first draft. The Delphi panel comprised 50 experts and patient and public involvement participants, while 46 participants attended the consensus conference. In total, the participants in these stages of the process approved 66 recommendations, covering the topics “indications”, “intent/purpose [of sedation]”, “decision-making”, “information and consent”, “medication and type of sedation”, “monitoring”, “management of fluids and nutrition”, “continuing other measures”, “support for relatives”, and “team support”. The recommendations include suggestions on terminology and comments on legal issues. Conclusion: Further research will be required for evaluating the feasibility of the recommendations’ implementation and their effectiveness. The recommendations and the suggested terminology may serve as a resource for healthcare professionals in Germany on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and may contribute to discussion on the topic at an international level.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/113903
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/111945
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: BMC palliative care
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher Place: London
Volume: 22
Original Publication: 10.1186/s12904-023-01243-z
Page Start: 1
Page End: 14
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12904-023-01243-z.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open