Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115202
Titel: Intranasal lidocaine administration via mucosal atomization device : a simple and successful treatment for postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients
Autor(en): Siegler, Benedikt HermannIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Dos Santos Pereira, Rui PedroIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Keßler, JensIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Wallwiener, StephanieIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Wallwiener, MarkusIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Larmann, JanIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Picardi, SusanneIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Carr, RichardIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Weigand, Markus A.In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Oehler, BeatriceIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: (1) Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) remains a serious complication in obstetric patients. While the epidural blood patch represents the current gold standard in therapy, a growing number of alternative measures are thought to be beneficial for clinical management. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine administration to treat PDPH in obstetrics at our university hospital; (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with PDPH has been performed focusing on the techniques of administration, dosing, treatment duration, impact on pain intensity as well as side effects of intranasal lidocaine; (3) Results: During the study period, 5610 obstetric patients received neuraxial anesthesia, of whom 43 (0.77%) developed PDPH. About one third of the patients with PDPH after spinal anesthesia (n = 8), epidural anesthesia (n = 5) or both (n = 2) were treated with intranasal lidocaine. Lidocaine was administered either via gauze compresses (GC, n = 4), a mucosal atomization device (MAD, n = 8) or with a second-line mucosal atomization device due to low gauze compress efficacy (n = 3). All patients treated with lidocaine refused the epidural blood patch. Nebulization of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity after the first dose (p = 0.008). No relevant side effects developed except sporadic temporal pharyngeal numbness. The utilization of the mucosal atomization device averted the necessity for an epidural blood patch, whether employed as the primary or secondary approach; (4) Conclusions: Our data imply that the mucosal atomization device enhances the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine administration in obstetric patients suffering from PDPH.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/117158
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115202
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: Biomedicines
Verlag: MDPI
Verlagsort: Basel
Band: 11
Heft: 12
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.3390/biomedicines11123296
Seitenanfang: 1
Seitenende: 14
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
biomedicines-11-03296.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen