Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/116825
Title: Pain medication and pain intensity following hip fractures-analyses based on the ProFem cohort study
Author(s): Jobski, KathrinLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Ritschel, MichaelaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Pöggel-Krämer, Katja
Anheier, Daniela
Haastert, BurkhardLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Gontscharuk, VeronikaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Arend, Werner
Baltes-Schmitt, MarionLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Stephan, Astrid
Meyer, GabrieleLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2024
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Purpose: Pain is a common symptom following proximal femoral fractures (PFF), however, information on its treatment in terms of agents and type of use (scheduled vs. pro re nata [PRN]) is scarce. The main objective of this study was to examine pain medication regimens according to pain intensity following PFF. Furthermore, we explored the utilization of medication plans. Methods: The “ProFem”-study on healthcare provision, functional ability, and quality of life after PFF is a German population-based prospective cohort study based on statutory health insurance data and individually linked survey data from different time points including information on the currently used medication. This present analysis refers to the participants' baseline interviews (about 3 months following PFF) conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the participants' private surroundings. Results: The study population comprised 444 participants (mean age: 81.2 years, 71.0% female). Half of them reported high intensity pain, and the mean value for the EuroQol visual analogue scale was 50.8. Most commonly used analgesics were metamizole and tilidine/naloxone. Among participants with high intensity pain, 21.9% received only PRN pain medication and 17.2% no pain medication at all. Overall, 61.5% of participants presented any (printed) medication plan and only 25.2% a “federal standardized medication plan” (BMP). Conclusion: As a substantial number of patients reports high intensity pain about 3 months following a PFF, the large proportion of those receiving no or only PRN pain medication raises questions regarding the appropriateness of the therapy. The overall low utilization of the BMP indicates potential for improvement.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/118785
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/116825
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0
Journal Title: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Publisher: Wiley
Publisher Place: Chichester [u.a.]
Volume: 33
Issue: 8
Original Publication: 10.1002/pds.5865
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU