Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118279
Title: | Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting : sixteen years of single-center experience |
Author(s): | Weymann, Alexander![]() Amanov, Lukman ![]() Beltsios, Eleftherios ![]() Rad, Arian Arjomandi Szczechowicz, Marcin ![]() Merzah, Ali Saad Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq ![]() Schmack, Bastian ![]() Ismail, Issam ![]() Popov, Aron-Frederik ![]() Ruhparwar, Arjang ![]() Zubarevich, Alina ![]() |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Abstract: | Background: Coronary artery disease is a major cause of death globally. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), using a small left anterior thoracotomy, aims to provide a less invasive alternative to traditional procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes with reduced recovery times. Methods: This retrospective, non-randomized study analyzed 310 patients who underwent MIDCAB between July 1999 and April 2022. Data were collected on demographics, clinical characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes, and follow-up mortality and morbidity. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS, with survival curves generated via the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 63.3 ± 10.9 years, with 30.6% females. The majority of surgeries were elective (76.1%), with an average operating time of 129.7 ± 35.3 min. The median rate of intraoperative blood transfusions was 0.0 (CI 0.0–2.0) Units. The mean in-hospital stay was 8.7 ± 5.5 days, and the median ICU stay was just one day. Early postoperative complications were minimal, with a 0.64% in-hospital mortality rate. The 6-month and 1-year mortalities were 0.97%, with a 10-year survival rate of 94.3%. There were two cases of perioperative myocardial infarction and no instances of stroke or new onset dialysis. Conclusions: The MIDCAB approach demonstrates significant benefits in terms of patient recovery and long-term outcomes, offering a viable and effective alternative for patients suitable for less invasive procedures. Our results suggest that MIDCAB is a safe option with favorable survival rates, justifying its consideration in high-volume centers focused on minimally invasive techniques. |
URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120238 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118279 |
Open Access: | ![]() |
License: | ![]() |
Journal Title: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Publisher Place: | Basel |
Volume: | 13 |
Issue: | 11 |
Original Publication: | 10.3390/jcm13113338 |
Page Start: | 1 |
Page End: | 10 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
jcm-13-03338.pdf | 496.48 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |