Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118634
Title: Do or don’t: : results of a multinational survey on antibiotic prophylaxis in urodynamics
Author(s): Stangl, Fabian P.
Schneidewind, LailaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Wagenlehner, FlorianLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schultz-Lampel, DanielaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Baessler, KavenLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Naumann, GertLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schönburg, SandraLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Anheuser, PetraLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Winkelhog-Gran, Susanne
Saar, MatthiasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Hüsch, TanjaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kranz, JenniferLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2023
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Antibiotic prophylaxis contributes substantially to the increase in antibiotic resistance rates worldwide. This investigation aims to assess the current standard of practice in using antibiotic prophylaxis for urodynamics (UDS) and identify barriers to guideline adherence. An online survey using a 22-item questionnaire designed according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) was circulated among urologists and gynecologists in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland between September 2021 and March 2022. A total of 105 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Out of 105 completed surveys, most responders (n = 99, 94%) regularly perform dipstick urine analysis prior to urodynamics, but do not perform a urine culture (n = 68, 65%). Ninety-eight (93%) participants refrain from using antibiotic prophylaxis, and sixty-eight (65%) use prophylaxis if complicating factors exist. If asymptomatic bacteriuria is present, approximately 54 (52%) participants omit UDS and reschedule the procedure until antimicrobial susceptibility testing is available. Seventy-eight (78%) participants do not have a standard procedure for antibiotic prophylaxis in their department. Part of the strategy against the development of bacterial resistance is the optimized use of antibiotics, including antibiotic prophylaxis in urodynamics. Establishing a standard procedure is necessary and purposeful to harmonize both aspects in the field of urological diagnostics.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120592
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118634
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: Antibiotics
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 12
Issue: 7
Original Publication: 10.3390/antibiotics12071219
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
antibiotics-12-01219.pdf787.22 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open