Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120203
Title: "Is this sedation?" : A Group Delphi process to define cut-off doses and dosing intervals for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care
Author(s): Krauss, Sabine H.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Rémi, ConstanzeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Bausewein, ClaudiaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Bazata, Jeremias
Grebe, Alina
Ostgathe, ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schildmann, JanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schildmann, EvaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2025
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: In palliative care, it can be challenging to distinguish between reduced consciousness related to the illness and sedation due to a potentially sedating drug (intended, or unintended). These differentiations are important because unintended sedation requires consideration of alternative treatment options, and intentional sedation demands compliance with guidelines. The aim of the study, which was part of the consortium project iSedPall, was to determine cut-off values for drugs’ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in defined depth of sedation/continuous effect. Methods: Group Delphi conducted in Germany with prior online survey. Based on a review of the literature, statements regarding cut-off values for drugs´ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in a defined depth of sedation/continuous effect were developed for 11 drugs. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. Statements with lower agreement entered the next round of discussion. Between the rounds (5 small groups, 3 – 4 participants each), the results were presented and discussed. If necessary, statements were adapted for the following round. Participating experts were physicians, pharmacists, and nurses experienced in palliative care, mostly with over 10 years of professional experience. Results: 25/30 invited experts participated in the online survey, 17 in the Group Delphi. 12/33 statements were consented in the survey. The initial questionnaire for the Group Delphi comprised 22 statements on ten drugs. After three rounds, consensus was reached for all statements, determining cut-off doses/dosing intervals for lorazepam, midazolam, diazepam, levomepromazine, haloperidol, melperone, pipamperone, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and trazodone. Conclusions: This study for the first time provides evidence- and expert consensus-based data to support clinical judgements regarding sedating effects of a range of potentially sedating drugs commonly used in palliative care.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/122162
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120203
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: BMC palliative care
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher Place: London
Volume: 24
Original Publication: 10.1186/s12904-025-01781-8
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12904-025-01781-8.pdf2.97 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open