Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120786
Title: | Recruitment and baseline characteristics of participants in the AgeWell.de study : a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled lifestyle trial against cognitive decline |
Author(s): | Röhr, Susanne![]() Zülke, Andrea Luppa, Melanie Brettschneider, Christian Weißenborn, Marina ![]() Kühne, Flora Zöllinger, Isabel Samos, Franziska-Antonia Zora Bauer, Alexander Döhring, Juliane Krebs-Hein, Kerstin Oey, Anke Czock, David ![]() Frese, Thomas Gensichen, Jochen Haefeli, Walter E. ![]() Hoffmann, Wolfgang Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna König, Hans-Helmut Thyrian, Jochen René Wiese, Birgitt Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Abstract: | Targeting dementia prevention, first trials addressing multiple modifiable risk factors showed promising results in at-risk populations. In Germany, AgeWell.de is the first large-scale initiative investigating the effectiveness of a multi-component lifestyle intervention against cognitive decline. We aimed to investigate the recruitment process and baseline characteristics of the AgeWell.de participants to gain an understanding of the at-risk population and who engages in the intervention. General practitioners across five study sites recruited participants (aged 60–77 years, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia/CAIDE dementia risk score ≥ 9). Structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with eligible participants, including neuropsychological assessments. We analyzed group differences between (1) eligible vs. non-eligible participants, (2) participants vs. non-participants, and (3) between intervention groups. Of 1176 eligible participants, 146 (12.5%) dropped out before baseline; the study population was thus 1030 individuals. Non-participants did not differ from participants in key sociodemographic factors and dementia risk. Study participants were M = 69.0 (SD = 4.9) years old, and 52.1% were women. The average Montreal Cognitive Assessment/MoCA score was 24.5 (SD = 3.1), indicating a rather mildly cognitively impaired study population; however, 39.4% scored ≥ 26, thus being cognitively unimpaired. The bandwidth of cognitive states bears the interesting potential for differential trial outcome analyses. However, trial conduction is impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring adjustments to the study protocol with yet unclear methodological consequences. |
Annotations: | Gesehen am 09.03.2021 |
URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/122741 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/120786 |
Open Access: | ![]() |
License: | ![]() |
Journal Title: | International journal of environmental research and public health |
Publisher: | MDPI AG |
Publisher Place: | Basel |
Volume: | 18 |
Issue: | 2 |
Original Publication: | 10.3390/ijerph18020408 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ijerph-18-00408.pdf | 804.86 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |