Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121052
Title: Combining reversible electroporation and bleomycin in treatment of arteriovenous malformations
Author(s): Obereisenbuchner, FlorianLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schmidt, Vanessa FranziskaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Goldann, Constantin ImmanuelLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Brill, RichardLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Wohlgemuth, Walter A.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
[und viele weitere]
Issue Date: 2025
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Purpose This study aims to evaluate and compare safety and clinical outcomes of reversible electroporation with either intravenous (BEST) or intraarterial (BEET) Bleomycin application treating extracranial AVMs unsuitable for conventional approaches defined as fine-fistulous AVMs close to vulnerable anatomical structures (such as skin/end-arteries) not amenable for embolization or resection due to inappropriate risk/benefit and/or therapy-refractory or recurrent lesions. Materials and Methods This is a sub-analysis of the prospective multicenter APOLLON trial (German clinical trial register, DRKS00021019). Clinical and imaging findings were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up to evaluate subjective outcome (symptom-free, partial relief, no improvement, clinical progression) and AVM lesion devascularization on MRI (total, 100%; substantial, 76–99%; partial, 51–75%; slight, 50%; progression). BEST versus BEET was at the discretion of the operator; subgroup outcome comparisons were subsequently performed. Results Twenty-one AVM patients received 31 treatments (16/31 BEST, 51.6%; 15/31 BEET, 48.4%); the mean number of procedures per patient was 1.5 (± 0.7). Complications occurred after 7/31 (22.6%) procedures, including 6.4% major complications (delayed wound healing solved by split-skin transplantation, persistant scarring). Subjective outcome revealed partial symptom relief in 13/21 (61.9%) patients, and 4/21 (19.0%) patients presented symptom-free. In 4/21 (19.0%) patients, no improvement or symptom worsening was reported. Imaging revealed complete devascularization in one case (6.3%), substantial (76–99%) and partial (51–75%) devascularization in 6/16 (36.5%) patients, respectively, while progression was noted in 3/16 (18.8%) patients. Comparison of clinical outcomes differed between both approaches, with BEET being superior to BEST (p = 0.04). Conclusion The combination of reversible electroporation and bleomycin is effective for treatment of AVMs; BEET tends to present superior to BEST regarding patients ’ outcome.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/123007
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121052
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: CardioVascular and interventional radiology
Publisher: Springer
Publisher Place: Berlin
Volume: 48
Original Publication: 10.1007/s00270-025-04178-5
Page Start: 1632
Page End: 1637
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00270-025-04178-5.pdf546.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open