Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/63026
Title: Methodological challenges and solution strategies during implementation of a midwife-led multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in maternity hospitals
Author(s): Striebich, SabineLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Mattern, ElkeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Oganowski, Theresa
Schäfers, RainhildLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Ayerle, Gertrud M.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2021
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially multicentric, with complex interventions are methodically challenging. Careful planning under everyday conditions in compliance with the relevant international quality standard (Good Clinical Practice [GCP] guideline) is crucial. Specific challenges exist for RCTs conducted in delivery rooms due to various factors that cannot be planned beforehand. Few published RCTs report challenges and problems in implementing complex interventions in maternity wards. In Germany as well as in other countries, midwives and obstetricians have frequently little experience as investigators in clinical trials. Methods: The aim is to describe the key methodological and organizational challenges in conducting a multicenter study in maternity wards and the solution strategies applied to them. In particular, project-related and process-oriented challenges for hospital staff are considered. The exemplarily presented randomized controlled trial “BE-UP” investigates the effectiveness of an alternative design of a birthing room on the rate of vaginal births and women-specific outcomes. Results: The results are presented in five sectors: 1) Selection of and support for cooperating hospitals: they are to be selected according to predefined criteria, and strategies to offer continuous support in trial implementation must be mapped out. 2) Establishing a process of requesting informed consent: a quality-assured process to inform pregnant women early on must be feasible and effective. 3) Individual digital real-time randomization: In addition to instructing maternity teams, appropriate measures for technical failure must be provided. 4) The standardized birthing room: The complex intervention is to be implemented according to the study protocol yet adapted to the prevailing conditions in the delivery rooms. 5) GCP-compliant documentation: midwives and obstetricians will be instructed in high-quality data collection, supported by external monitoring throughout the trial. Conclusion: Since not all potential challenges can be anticipated in the planning of a trial, study teams need to be flexible and react promptly to any problems that threaten recruitment or the implementation of the complex intervention. Thought should be given to the perspectives of midwives and obstetricians as recruiters and how clinic-intern processes could be adapted to correspond with the trial’s requirements.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/64977
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/63026
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Sponsor/Funder: Publikationsfonds MLU
Journal Title: BMC medical research methodology
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher Place: London
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Original Publication: 10.1186/s12874-021-01429-0
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12874-021-01429-0.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open