Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118279| Titel: | Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting : sixteen years of single-center experience |
| Autor(en): | Weymann, Alexander Amanov, Lukman Beltsios, Eleftherios Rad, Arian Arjomandi Szczechowicz, Marcin Merzah, Ali Saad Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq Schmack, Bastian Ismail, Issam Popov, Aron-Frederik Ruhparwar, Arjang Zubarevich, Alina |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2024 |
| Art: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Zusammenfassung: | Background: Coronary artery disease is a major cause of death globally. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), using a small left anterior thoracotomy, aims to provide a less invasive alternative to traditional procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes with reduced recovery times. Methods: This retrospective, non-randomized study analyzed 310 patients who underwent MIDCAB between July 1999 and April 2022. Data were collected on demographics, clinical characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes, and follow-up mortality and morbidity. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS, with survival curves generated via the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 63.3 ± 10.9 years, with 30.6% females. The majority of surgeries were elective (76.1%), with an average operating time of 129.7 ± 35.3 min. The median rate of intraoperative blood transfusions was 0.0 (CI 0.0–2.0) Units. The mean in-hospital stay was 8.7 ± 5.5 days, and the median ICU stay was just one day. Early postoperative complications were minimal, with a 0.64% in-hospital mortality rate. The 6-month and 1-year mortalities were 0.97%, with a 10-year survival rate of 94.3%. There were two cases of perioperative myocardial infarction and no instances of stroke or new onset dialysis. Conclusions: The MIDCAB approach demonstrates significant benefits in terms of patient recovery and long-term outcomes, offering a viable and effective alternative for patients suitable for less invasive procedures. Our results suggest that MIDCAB is a safe option with favorable survival rates, justifying its consideration in high-volume centers focused on minimally invasive techniques. |
| URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120238 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/118279 |
| Open-Access: | Open-Access-Publikation |
| Nutzungslizenz: | (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
| Journal Titel: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Verlag: | MDPI |
| Verlagsort: | Basel |
| Band: | 13 |
| Heft: | 11 |
| Originalveröffentlichung: | 10.3390/jcm13113338 |
| Seitenanfang: | 1 |
| Seitenende: | 10 |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jcm-13-03338.pdf | 496.48 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Open-Access-Publikation
