Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119035
Titel: Artificial intelligence in medical care - patients' perceptions on caregiving relationships and ethics : a qualitative study
Autor(en): Gundlack, Jana
Negash, Sarah
Thiel, CarolinIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Buch, CharlotteIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Schildmann, JanIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Unverzagt, Susanne
Mikolajczyk, RafaelIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Frese, ThomasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2025
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers several opportunities to enhance medical care, but practical application is limited. Consideration of patient needs is essential for the successful implementation of AI‐based systems. Few studies have explored patients' perceptions, especially in Germany, resulting in insufficient exploration of perspectives of outpatients, older patients and patients with chronic diseases. We aimed to explore how patients perceive AI in medical care, focusing on relationships to physicians and ethical aspects. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with six semi‐structured focus groups from June 2022 to March 2023. We analysed data using a content analysis approach by systemising the textual material via a coding system. Participants were mostly recruited from outpatient settings in the regions of Halle and Erlangen, Germany. They were enrolled primarily through convenience sampling supplemented by purposive sampling. Results: Patients (N = 35; 13 females, 22 males) with a median age of 50 years participated. Participants were mixed in socioeconomic status and affinity for new technology. Most had chronic diseases. Perceived main advantages of AI were its efficient and flawless functioning, its ability to process and provide large data volume, and increased patient safety. Major perceived disadvantages were impersonality, potential data security issues, and fear of errors based on medical staff relying too much on AI. A dominant theme was that human interaction, personal conversation, and understanding of emotions cannot be replaced by AI. Participants emphasised the need to involve everyone in the informing process about AI. Most considered physicians as responsible for decisions resulting from AI applications. Transparency of data use and data protection were other important points.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/120991
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/119035
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: Health expectations
Verlag: Wiley-Blackwell
Verlagsort: Oxford [u.a.]
Band: 28
Heft: 2
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1111/hex.70216
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU