Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121836
Title: Reference-group adjusted behavioural dysfunction questionnaire score discriminates highly behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia from major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's disease dementia
Author(s): Semenkova, Anna
Piguet, Olivier
Johnen, AndreasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Schroeter, MatthiasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Godulla, Jannis
Linnemann, ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Baumgärtner, MarkusLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Otto, MarkusLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Felbecker, AnsgarLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Wezel, Steven
Kressig, Reto W.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Berres, ManfredLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Sollberger, Marc
Issue Date: 2025
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background Given the fact that behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterised by behavioural disorders, the assessment of these disorders is essential for early diagnosis of bvFTD. In this regard, the recently developed Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire (BDQ) that captures the bvFTD-specific behavioural disorders is promising in discriminating mild-stage bvFTD from other neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. In this study, we aimed to increase the discriminatory power of the BDQ by adaptation of its scoring depending on the reference group to bvFTD. Methods In this combined prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study, data of 241 patients [i.e., 50 patients with mild-stage bvFTD, 71 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 120 patients with mild-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD)] were analysed. We calculated the BDQ score in two ways: (1) as the average score of the domains' mean scores and (2) by adjusting the scoring depending on the reference group by using machine learning techniques, validated by fivefold cross-validation. Results The adjusted BDQ score showed a higher (bvFTD vs. MDD) or similar (bvFTD vs. ADD) discriminatory power than the unadjusted BDQ score, with a considerably smaller difference between cut-offs with at least 90% sensitivity and at least 90% specificity. Conclusions We recommend using adjusted BDQ scores when MDD or ADD are the reference groups to bvFTD. Similar approaches should be taken for other reference groups to bvFTD to best reflect the thinking of clinicians who have specific reference groups in mind as differential diagnoses to bvFTD.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/123785
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121836
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: European journal of neurology
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Publisher Place: Oxford [u.a.]
Volume: 32
Issue: 11
Original Publication: 10.1111/ene.70424
Page Start: 1
Page End: 9
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU