Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121836
Titel: Reference-group adjusted behavioural dysfunction questionnaire score discriminates highly behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia from major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's disease dementia
Autor(en): Semenkova, Anna
Piguet, Olivier
Johnen, AndreasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Schroeter, MatthiasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Godulla, Jannis
Linnemann, ChristophIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Baumgärtner, MarkusIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Otto, MarkusIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Felbecker, AnsgarIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Wezel, Steven
Kressig, Reto W.In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Berres, ManfredIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Sollberger, Marc
Erscheinungsdatum: 2025
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: Background Given the fact that behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterised by behavioural disorders, the assessment of these disorders is essential for early diagnosis of bvFTD. In this regard, the recently developed Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire (BDQ) that captures the bvFTD-specific behavioural disorders is promising in discriminating mild-stage bvFTD from other neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. In this study, we aimed to increase the discriminatory power of the BDQ by adaptation of its scoring depending on the reference group to bvFTD. Methods In this combined prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study, data of 241 patients [i.e., 50 patients with mild-stage bvFTD, 71 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 120 patients with mild-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD)] were analysed. We calculated the BDQ score in two ways: (1) as the average score of the domains' mean scores and (2) by adjusting the scoring depending on the reference group by using machine learning techniques, validated by fivefold cross-validation. Results The adjusted BDQ score showed a higher (bvFTD vs. MDD) or similar (bvFTD vs. ADD) discriminatory power than the unadjusted BDQ score, with a considerably smaller difference between cut-offs with at least 90% sensitivity and at least 90% specificity. Conclusions We recommend using adjusted BDQ scores when MDD or ADD are the reference groups to bvFTD. Similar approaches should be taken for other reference groups to bvFTD to best reflect the thinking of clinicians who have specific reference groups in mind as differential diagnoses to bvFTD.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/123785
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121836
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: European journal of neurology
Verlag: Wiley-Blackwell
Verlagsort: Oxford [u.a.]
Band: 32
Heft: 11
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1111/ene.70424
Seitenanfang: 1
Seitenende: 9
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU